Starting with Firefox 148, which rolls out on Feb. 24, you’ll find a new AI controls section within the desktop browser settings. It provides a single place to block current and future generative AI features in Firefox.

They actually listened to the community, thats very nice.

  • MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s all well and good that they give you the ability to turn it off. What’s not changing though is that most of their focus will be on integrating AI which most people don’t want. As a result the pace of other new features being tested/implemented will probably slow significantly.

    • northernlights@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Plus, even if you can turn it off, the feature is still in the code, needing updates, etc., even if you don’t ever use it. Literal bloat.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Don’t forget adding additional surface area for security vulnerabilities. Does the off switch prevent a zero day attack via that code? Of course not.

        • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The feature would likely need to be enabled to take advantage of such vulnerability in said feature.

    • undu@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      What’s not changing though is that most of their focus will be on integrating AI which most people don’t want.

      I agree that AI chatbots are absolutely useless and have no place in a browser, but out of the three ML features in the screenshot, one is great for blind people, and another one is great for making the web more multilingual, so their usefulness is quite self-evident. Regarding ethics, at least for the last one it’s using a local model, and was trained using open-source datasets.[1]

      What makes so-called “AI” bad is not the amount of users that can benefit from it, but how useful it is to the people that do use the feature, which usually means having experts tailor machine learning unto a single purpose.

      I personally use the translation feature at least once a week when looking at news article that are not in English, and now I’m using a lot to translate Japanese webpages to plan a holiday there, so I’m very happy that Mozilla has invested time abd collaborated with universities to make this feature, I wish other people were less flippant about it just because it has “AI” in its name.

      [1] https://hacks.mozilla.org/2022/06/training-efficient-neural-network-models-for-firefox-translations/

      • MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It seems pretty clear to me that despite the ambiguity of the term AI, people are specifically railing against LLMs, not ML. It also seems clear to me that the new Firefox direction as announced by their CEO is to incorporate more LLM specifically into the browser.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also we have all seen this movie before. They launch with promises of having a choice to turn it on or off… until it’s no longer a choice.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          This happened quite often for various UI settings etc. Often there were technical reasons for removing the option (e.g. rewrites where they dropped features with low usage), but it is a real thing.

          • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            A lot of these are extensions that are folded into the main Firefox feature set, experimental features or not even related to the browser?

            • november@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Pocket’s dead now.

              Like another user said, where’s “open image in new tab”? (I notice you didn’t reply to them.)

              Remember XUL extensions and real browser themes?

              Remember when you didn’t need a developer account to make extensions and you could distribute them via your own website?

              But of course, Firefox never takes away choices that were previously offered.

              • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Didn’t people generally hate pocket’s forced integration? Anyways I’ve never said that they’ve never removed features nor was disagreeing that what you said isn’t generally true. It’s just that the list posted has a lot of examples that aren’t exactly a removal of a Firefox feature which hurts the argument being made. There’s more than enough reasons as you mentions to make a case for it.

                Like another user said, where’s “open image in new tab”? (I notice you didn’t reply to them.)

                I don’t see where’s the relevance in pointing out that I didn’t reply to another user’s post when I’m in agreement with them.

                Relax man, let’s have a civil discussion that doesn’t devolve into sarcasm.

              • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                “Open image…” is still there. If you’re not seeing it anymore, it’s sites taking it away from you. (I notice you didn’t check before getting outraged.)

      • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        You were always able to turn it off, now it’s easier.

        You haven’t seen this movie before with Firefox. All the ad stuff and sponsoring integrations like Pocket were always very easy to turn off.

    • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve already moved several family members away from Chrome, Firefox etc

      Waterfox, while sharing a basic codebase, doesn’t have any of this bullshit and runs like a dream.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Since “AI” doesn’t exist, anything can be “AI”.

      For example, a translation program is not “AI”.

      But people do want features like translation regardless of how they’re dishonestly marketed.

    • catdog@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair, their reduced focus and the potential pace improvement through LLM assisted coding might cancel each other out. I wouldn’t be surprized if the resulting pace change is net zero or better.

      That said: I like Firefox local translations, but haven’t found a use case for its other AI features yet.