• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this why my wife is constantly complaining that her playlists constantly keep playing the same songs over and over?

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      My favourite example of Spotify being shit is:

      I want to play an album, so I go to it and press play. Then a bit later I want to queue a second album after the first one is done. How do I do that? As far as I can tell the answer is to go fuck myself. I have start a new queue or playlist with both albums in it.

      That’s apart from all the basic software quality stuff like randomly restarting the queue.

      Edit: so now I use finamp with jellyfin, which I can actually fix when it does something I hate.

      • unnamed1@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        Spotifys UX has always been terrible. We all got used to having crappy software. It’s too convenient that’s AI also makes crappy vibecode without supervision. No one will notice anything.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The point of these apps is to leech as much money as possible.

        An opposing goal would be to make the app better for users.

    • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      If I was working foe spotify I would honestly lie just to do something better than ask an AI to do bullshit for me

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not so sure. I could believe their entire productivity has been consumed by failing AI slop in code reviews.

  • Silver Needle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Spotify’s functions have not changed a bit since 2016. It is literally the same application, what has changed are the tiny things they’re doing for compatibility but that is not really worth mentioning. Intentionally leaving UX out.

    Honestly what code is there to write for this glorified web browser? They’re probably also outsourcing most of their data collection and recommendation algorithms.

    Buy physical media, rip CDs, share shit and that’s it

      • Silver Needle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wouldn’t place too much trust in Bandcamp. It was acquired by Epic Games and then sold to Songtradr shortly after, it’s waiting to enshittify. It might also be better to buy off of labels and artists directly if you want to “support” an artists or a label. Used CDs and vinyls are great too.

        • deathbird@mander.xyz
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah I download the files right away. It creates something of an Odysseus Pact I think. The second they stop offering me the downloads DRM free, I download the files DRM free elsewhere.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I find Bandcamp missing most of the artists I listen to. I’ve had a lot more success buying from Qobuz and beatport.

    • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Like a lot of these big, consolidated, years long projects, the real work is maintenance. The rest is just a bunch of people desperately trying to improve obscure KPIs by 1%.

      Mark Fisher’s idea of market stalinism comes to mind

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      You are wrong on many points IMO.
      I’ve been using it for nearly a decade, it’s changed a lot.
      I don’t know why you’d be leaving ux out.
      What code is there to write? You must be trolling come on now.

      • Silver Needle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve been using it for nearly a decade, it’s changed a lot.

        Same. I just simply don’t agree. If you consider tiny features not a soul needs like yearly reviews of one’s listening habits and the roll out of podcasts as things worth mentioning, ok, they were not exactly doing anything radically new at that point anyway.

        I don’t know why you’d be leaving ux out.

        Because UX 90% adds nothing and chiefly serves to suggest innovation.

        You must be trolling come on now.

        I am. I want Spotify employees to read this and get steamingly mad. They are complicit in ruining music.

        +edited for formatting

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      LOL. Exactly. This reminds me of a slop code change my manager recently posted. It was a million lines, where really it just needed to be like 3 or 4 lines. I refuse to do a real review for slop PRs.

      Later in standup he proudly proclaims, “You know, that PR was mostly Claude.” … … …

      I know! It was bad! You should feel bad! The fact that he was proud of it showed he doesn’t know what the hell he’s doing. More lines of code means higher performance, right?? 😂

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is that supposed to be impressive? Spotify is among the dumbest, shittiest apps. It’s literally just a music library player.

    Spotify doesn’t exist because it’s some genius app. It exists because of legal control. They have no reason to make the app better. Indeed their shitty capitalist motives continue to enshittify the app.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Do you know what we call someone that doesn’t write a single line of code?

    Anything other than a “developer”.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      A manager. This tool is for what managers think software development is: managing the production of code. From that perspective this hype makes a lot of sense, just turn all your current developers into managers with AI and you now have grown the team by 10x. You can go back in time and find many jokes about how adding more developers doesn’t speed up delivery but slows it down. I don’t see how AI would suddenly make that less true, especially since the AI is not accountable for its results, you are.

    • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lmao, exactly. If you’re not writing the code you’re not the developer, the AI is the developer. Youre just another asshole who gets paid to do nothing.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is spotify. It’s just a music player. The overwhelming bulk of the code was probably written like 20 years ago by a 15 year old.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Look at the feature list bragged about. It’s really simple stuff. I can absolutely believe they vibe coded that stuff.

      The “hardest” one was to feed listener history to an LLM and have it generate a playlist based on the titles. That’s such an absurdly trivial thing to do.

      It’s not rocket science. It’s a trivial streaming music player.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s a problem for the future team, not the current bosses who will give themselves golden parachutes.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Spotify has public databases? That’s so nice of them. Really progressive.

        So where can I download my fave albums?

        • HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, IMO, “public access” includes semi-restricted stuff, like the requirement for an account. E.g. rutracker is closer to public than to private, compared to REDacted. As for downloading, there’s not much technical difference between it and streaming, I.e. nothing really prevents you from playing into a virtual soundcard or even reverse-engineering the protocol and saving data directly (moreover, there are such projects on github)