I have a 56 TB local Unraid NAS that is parity protected against single drive failure, and while I think a single drive failing and being parity recovered covers data loss 95% of the time, I’m always concerned about two drives failing or a site-/system-wide disaster that takes out the whole NAS.

For other larger local hosters who are smarter and more prepared, what do you do? Do you sync it off site? How do you deal with cost and bandwidth needs if so? What other backup strategies do you use?

(Sorry if this standard scenario has been discussed - searching didn’t turn up anything.)

  • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I have a 120TB unraid server at home, and a 40TB unraid server at work. Both use 2 x parity disks.

    The critical work stuff backs up to home, and the critical home stuff backs up to work.

    The media is disposable.

    Both servers then back up to Crashplan on separate accounts - work uses the Australian server on a business account, home used the US server on a personal account.

    I figure I should be safe unless Australia and the US are nuked simultaneously… At which point my data integrity is probably not the most pressing issue.

  • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Well, first while raid is great, it’s not a replacement for backups. Raid is mostly useful if uptime is imperative, but does not protect against user errors, software errors, fs corruption, ransomware or a power surge killing the entire array.

    Since uptime isn’t an issue on my home nas, instead of parity I simply have cold backups which (supposedly) I plug in from time to time to scrub the filesystems.

    If a online drive dies I can simply restore it from backup and accept the downtime. For my anime I have simply one single backup, but or my most important files I have 2 backups just in case one fails. (Unfornately both onsite)

    On the other hand, for a client of mine’s server where uptime is imperative, in addiction to raid I have 2 automatic daily backups (which ideally one should be offsite but isn’t, at least they are in different floors of the same building).

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A second offsite NAS (my old one) with the same capacity for the larger files

    Backblaze B2 and a Hezner storage box for Really Important stuff.

  • INeedMana@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’ve been following this post since the first comment.

    And I have just put together my own RAID1 1TB NAS. And I did not think that 1TB will serve me forever, more like “a good start”.

    But the numbers I’ve been seeing in here… you guys are nuts 😆

  • randombullet@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I have 3 main NASes

    78TB (52TB usable) hot storage. ZFS1

    160TB (120TB) warm storage ZFS2

    48TB (24TB) off site. ZFS mirror

    I rsync every day from hot to off site.

    And once a month I turn on my warm storage and sync it.

    Warm and hot storage is at the same location.

    Off site storage is with a family friend who I trust. Data isn’t encrypted aside from in transit. That’s something else I’d like to mess with later.

    Core vital data is sprinkled around different continents with about 10TB. I have 2 nodes in 2 countries for vital data. These are with family.

    I think I have 5 total servers.

    Cost is a lot obviously, but pieced together over several years.

    The world will end before my data gets destroyed.

  • Batman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’ve started using k8up to save my photos and config to an encrypted restic repo in an s3 bucket. having a lot of trouble backing up my SQL DB though, not as easy as they make it sound.

  • dmention7@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Personally I deal with it by prioritizing the data.

    I have about the same total size Unraid NAS as you, but the vast majority is downloaded or ripped media that would be annoying to replace, but not disastrous.

    My personal photos, videos and other documents which are irreplaceable only make up a few TB, which is pretty managable to maintain true local and cloud backups of.

    Not sure if that helps at all in your situation.

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I have data that I actually care about in RAIDZ1 array with a hot standby and it is syched to the cloud. The rest (the vast majority) is in a RAIDZ5. If I lose it, I “lose” it. Its recoverable if I decide I want it again.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t for media. I have 2 parity drives and that’s it. I’d like to do some kind of off site mirror but I haven’t had time to figure it out and buying enough storage to do that is expensive.

    My actual data for like taxes and stuff is backed up to my server and backblaze.

  • irmadlad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not sure if I qualify as a ‘larger local hoster’ but I would go through your 20 TB and decide what really is important enough to backup in case the wheels fall off. Linux ISOs, those can be re-downloaded, although it would take a bit of time. The things that can’t be readily downloaded such as my music collection that I have been accumulating for decades, converted to flac, and meticulously tagged, can’t be re-downloaded. So that is one of my priorities to back up. Pictures, business documents, personal documents, can’t be re-downloaded, so that goes on the ‘must back up’ list…and so on. Just cull out what is and isn’t replaceable. I would bet that once you do that, your 20 TB will be a bit more slim, and you’re not trying to push 20TB up the pipe to a cloud backup.

    I use BackBlaze’s Personal, unlimited tier for $99 USD per year, which is a pretty sweet deal. One thing about Backblaze to remember is that the drives being backed up must be physically connected to the PC doing the backup/uploading. I get around that because I have a hot swap bay on my main PC, but there are other methods and software that will masquerade your NAS or other as a physically connected drive.

    • countstex@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I use backblaze too, started with the personal back up, but swapped to the B2 solution as it was supported by my NAS. The cost of the actual storage isn’t much, most of the cost is in access, so for data that doesn’t alter much it worked out just as cheap, and easier to do things that way.

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        and easier to do things that way.

        I’m cheap and my labor is free. LOL But you do have a point.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Backup to 2nd nas.

    Important stuff gets backed up to cloud storage. Whatever is cheapest.

    In my case Synology c2 cloud was cheapest.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It offers some other features like hybrid access to data,If my nas isn’t available I can access it from their cloud. There’s also some identity services.

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    What’s your recovery needs?

    It’s ok to take 6 months to backup to a cloud provider, but do you need all your data to be recovered in a short period of time? If so, cloud isn’t the solution, you’d need a duplicate set of drives nearby (but not close enough for the same flood, fire, etc.

    But, if you’re ok waiting for the data to download again (and check the storage provider costs for that specific scenario), then your main factor is how much data changes after that initial 1st upload.

  • worhui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Lto tape. But I only have 15tb

    It quickly becomes cost effective when you actually need the data to be safe. Far easier to have off site backups. I have never had a problem , but I like to have offline backup. Most of the time my data is static. So I am only backing up projects files ans changes for the most part.

    If you have 40+ tb of dynamic data I can’t help there.

    Edit: I buy used drives that are usually 2 generations old, so I got lto-5 drives when lto 7 was new. The used drives may be less reliable but used drives can be 1/10th the price of the newest ones.