• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    2 months ago

    Simple solution. From now on Linux distros should ship with a big message “NOT FOR USE IN CALIFORNIA”.

    You want to force age verification? No server in all of California will run. Period.

      • Willoughby@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        “We’re every datacenter in Canada e Mexico and we collectively and politely agreed it’s a good move as well.”

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah… It says just that in the article. You did read the article, right? I mean you didn’t just read the title and then rush in here to make a comment?

      • fernandofig@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Where, pray tell? Out of curiosity I went there to check it out, and the “article” is just 3 paragraphs that just barely expand on the title. Maybe uBlock is triggering some invisible paywall there for me?

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Supposedly the age verification thing that’s needed is the equivalent to a porn site verification. Just enter a birthday that’s in the 1800s, and you’re set. This is still a bad direction to go towards though, as it’ll set precedent for future bullshit.

      • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is nothing that’s “needed”. Its an OS not some demonic construct. It should also be noted that teens will be impacted in it as well - all minors. All this age gating, discriminatory behaviour is eating us alive. Age verification should not exist at all.

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Exactly. Today you can enter Jan 1 1800 and it will take it. That’s not the problem.

        The real problem is the precedence it sets. An asinine rule gets passed and companies adhere to it, meaning they are enforcers.

        Tomorrow when laws require real verification, like ID scan then they’ve already agreed to be the gate keeper for said asinine laws. It’s harder to back out at that point.

        It’s all surveillance and it should be stopped.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whose age do they want on the server? The admins? Whoever staged it? Lol. Sure. Jan 1 1970.

      Do I need to put my birthdate onto my firewalls?

      Ooh are all enterprise firewalls going to start coming with CISA filters pre-enabled? Gotta protect those kids!