• squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is - unfortunately - not surprising. Niantic has always been in the business of selling/using user data for profit, they were a spin-off from Google after all. Their first big game, Ingress, was used to train Google Maps.

  • Anaeijon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unknowingly?

    Ingress was quite transparent about the goal of gathering real-world data to allows development of future technologies like self-driving and navigation.

    It’s the reason, why I started playing it around 2012.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Most people just want to collect Pokemon and don’t read up on what the company that made the app is doing.

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah I’m perfectly fine telling Big Data that where I walk is a walkable path or that the PoIs I pass exist there. There are just as many positive uses of that info as negative.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This is a reason why you should actually read the Terms of Service and don’t use the product if you don’t agree with them. Niantic’s ability to use your images like this would have been in the ToS.

    AI has made this a bit easier since you can copy and paste the ToS into an LLM and ask it summarize the terms and point out the most important clauses (and clauses that aren’t typical)

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t automatically have a negative opinion about this, I would need more information before that. Did the terms of service allow for this?

    It’s a fascinating case study on crowdsourcing data that is useful to this navigation technology, and reminds me of the first captchas that helped train OCR engines.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah this is like 90% of all of Google’s business model. Captchas to train OCR or tag crosswalks, vehicles, etc. for other computer vision. GOOG-411 to train voice recognition for the Google assistant.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Google voice only makes sense as a data play too, for voicemail data, etc.

        YouTube is a massive dataset. Part of their recent crackdowns on downloading tools and 3rd party apps is around keeping that data for themselves.

  • motruck@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nothing is free and everything will be stored.

    AI already knows who you are online only the few can see those results but you bet your ass they are making machine generated profiles of you to sell ads.

    Ephemeral communication is only way forward.