Batteries have become much cheaper, making energy storage far more affordable.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    The price of the batteries was never really the issue, it was their weight versus their capacity with some consideration towards size and robustness.

    As far as I can tell, today the biggest hurdle is charging.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You obviously weren’t buying batteries in the 70’s or the 80’s or the 90’s.
      So my guess is that you are younger than 40.

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        As it happens, actually I was buying batteries in the 1970’s. They were massive and lasted plenty long enough to play audio cassettes for several days.

        Edit: I’d also point out that three decades is 1996, not 1976, that’s five decades.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Nonono that is outright false, even 6 of the big D batteries, would last only a few hours in even a small ghetto blaster of the late 70’s. Radio yes, tape no. The tapes took massive amounts of power even in a small player for the time.
          But apart from that all other uses of batteries were a pain, like in flashlights that weren’t even very good by today’s standards, or bicycle lights where batteries were a joke so we had to use dynamos.

          Your memory is simply wrong. IDK if they have declined 99%, but for sure batteries today are both 10 times better and only a tenth the price compared to the 70’s.
          Although they are just fake numbers that seem right, it actually fits with the 99%
          Althoug 3 decades only brings us back to the mid 90’s, I think that at least in some cases it is true.

          Batteries are way cheaper and better now, whether it’s 80% or 99% IDK, but for sure iẗ́s more than 80%.

          • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Having had a mono radio cassette player in my bedroom in 1976, running off D-cells, that was not my experience.

            The biggest drain was the volume, not the cassette player. You noticed it getting slower and slower, but the drain came from playing it loud.

            My Sony Walkman a few years later ran forever on its batteries.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Admittedly I never had a walkman. Maybe you were more privileged than I was, because I remember batteries as very expensive.
              But a walkman was way way later than the 70’s.,