• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fuck these incompetent headline writers who cant use units correctly. At this point they are doing this shit on purpose to ragebait people into reading the article. And they dont even explain what that headline is supposed to mean in the article. Does the output power ramp up that fast or do they mean that it can actually just output a lot of energy really fast?

    • CombatWombat@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      3 months ago

      I am also fascinated by the measurement “two soccer fields.” Americans largely play soccer on American football fields, so any American would just say “two football fields.” But everyone else hates calling it “soccer” and prefer to use metric rather than comparisons? This just seems like they chose all their measurements to be maximally irritating.

      • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, nobody play soccer in Switzerland, they play football, how would they know how big is soccer field?

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Actually, the headline isn’t wrong, you just read it wrong.

      The article specifies:

      • 2.1 GWh total storage capacity
      • 1.2 GW peak output
      • can ramp up to that peak output within milliseconds

      Every power source has a ramp up time. Ramping up e.g. a nuclear reactor can take hours, so if demand fluctuates it takes long for it to spin up.

      This one here can ramp up almost instantly to cover for fluctuations in the network, especially those caused by the unpredictable nature of renewable power generators.