• EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Starlink has been criticized for filling the sky with satellites, which will become space trash. Iran is clearing space of future garbage.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      As fun it would be, it would pollute so much spaceflight could become impossible for years.

      • iocase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        The only good news is any debris you generate has some part of its orbit extremely low due to starlink satellites being so low themselves. That’ll stop being true once debris finds something else to hit higher up but it’s easier to deorbit stuff this low since there’s really quite a bit of atmospheric drag at periapse.

        Edit: I should clarify that even after a collision debris has to have an orbit that crosses through the altitude the impact happened at unless some more energy is added higher up in its new elliptical orbit

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          That seems reasonable. Is there some risk that parts that entered other parts will throw things up in a much higher orbit or would that be improbable? Like a broken part smashing into another satellite at top speed.

          • iocase@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 days ago

            I’m prefacing this by saying my background is playing KSP and inadvertantly making my own Kessler syndrome when running out of fuel braking during a station rendezvous 😅

            Yeah you’re fundamentally trading energy. It depends on how the impact happens but orbital scientists think in terms of the average velocity of a collision event and their likely angle. 30⁰ head on at 7km/s is roughly normal I think?

            A head on collision means that you have the full kinetic energy of both satellites to work with. Some parts get thrown up into massive orbits even up into medium earth orbit. Others deorbit due to hitting at the right angle to lose enough kinetic energy that their orbit drops.

            Overall your debris ends up in a plume heading in the direction of both satellites, shaped like a flat cone. In the case of starlink they might have to deorbit the entire constellation while they still have control over them since that cone is invariably going to shotgun blast one or more satellites on the next orbital string

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        The most optimal route would be a cyberattack that causes all of the satellites to de-orbit, but that would honestly be a bigger challenge than STUXNET lol.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’m not surprised. It is the reason why companies like SpaceX don’t want to be dual use if they don’t have to.