• Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Personally, I think this is just another chapter in the conflict the DOJ is having against Anthropic because they refused to let their tools be used for war.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      They did allow them to be used for war. Anthropic’s only red lines were autonomous weapons (technically still a ways off) and domestic surveillance (it was this one where a ‘No’ would have been relevant right now).

      It should really alarm everyone that the US gov is using things like the first ever declaration of an American company as a supply chain risk or calling “fix this insecure code” something requiring export control and IDs to verify citizenship of usage as a way to warn other companies to comply with their illegal usage requests.

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    I feel like making ’90s-style t-shirts with ‘fix this code’ on the front and ‘this shirt is a munition’ on the back.”

    This must be a reference to something specific… Anyone knows?