I’m not an AI techie and I’m not well educated on LLMs/AI in general. The issue I’m having is the dichotomy between how people talk about it. I’ve heard completely opposite ends of the spectrum. From AI is quickly becoming advanced enough to threaten human society, all the way to its a glorified dictionary/search engine that can’t really do much of anything. I know Lemmy has a steep anti-AI slant. But, can someone talk about this in a way I can wrap my head around why the divide seems so big?

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    emergent behaviour and microscopic differences in huge amounts of parallel computations

    • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Emergent behavior meaning what?

      Which “microscopic” differences?

      • weps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hey, Socrates

        look for “emergent behaviour in computers” and specifically the non-programmed behaviour

        look for “floating point non determinism” to see how the same program can produce different results

        keep in mind you asked me on what I base that I think computers don’t only do what they are programmed to do

        • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You know, acting like a dickhead doesn’t really strengthen your argument.

          I’ll speak to someone less pompous about this