After a Swiss court order, and they only could provide an IP adressen where the account was first made. Don’t spread partial information that doesn’t reflect wat happened.
This is exactly the sort of thing why im baffled that people are leaving for companies in countries with either little or literally no data privacy laws.
Sure andy is a dipshit. But at least he doesn’t get a god damn say over how some things are done. Because the law sits out side his control.
I think I was pretty clear I didn’t know the full details in my comment. Besides, I don’t see what is misinformation here. And IP address is a user’s data.
There was something before that about providing a journalists data to authorities or something too.
After a Swiss court order, and they only could provide an IP adressen where the account was first made. Don’t spread partial information that doesn’t reflect wat happened.
This is exactly the sort of thing why im baffled that people are leaving for companies in countries with either little or literally no data privacy laws.
Sure andy is a dipshit. But at least he doesn’t get a god damn say over how some things are done. Because the law sits out side his control.
You make a great point.
But have you never met a CEO who used their access to break the law?
Trust is tricky, and an individual choice.
My security use case isn’t preventing government access.
I think I was pretty clear I didn’t know the full details in my comment. Besides, I don’t see what is misinformation here. And IP address is a user’s data.
Do share how much data they could actually provide