• Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    The terminal is not fancy, or pretty, and its not that nice to use, but its always available and it gets the job done, just like OPs mum

  • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    Intellij: Has a modern GUI for Git with code cleanup, import optimization and visualization of changes.

    Me: Open terminal, ‘git commit -m “wrote code” && git push’. Then realize I forgot to add half of the files, so I make another commit. Then realize I forgot to cleanup bad indents, so I make another commit. Then realize my code doesn’t even build, so I make another commit, etc.

    • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The only Git GUI that I find actually lets me do the basics in a simple way is GitHub desktop. It allows me to quickly see a diff of the changes, select a few lines or a chunk or all the file, it manages stashes and conflicts for me which is like 98% of my usage. Otherwise I use gitui or the git cli for anything more complex than committing and switching/merging branches.

      • kdm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’ve started using LazyGit recently and I love it. It runs in CLI and essentially just maps the git commands to keyboard shortcuts. Really easy to use and learn, definitely increased my productivity

  • Yaarmehearty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    I can’t say I love the terminal, if there’s a GUI for a task I’ll use that but there comes a time in every troubleshooting session where the terminal is just the only way to do something reliably.

    I’m not going to lie though, I forget commands constantly so have to search the most basic shit to type in.

        • PlutoParty@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ash is the only one I’m aware of, but that’s primarily going to be found and used on stuff like routers or other embedded devices. Any modern shell can support history. That said, many users will disable it or wipe it on logout for security reasons.

          • chitak166@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s not just history support. It will provide autocomplete suggestions based on what you’ve already typed and allow you to browse the history of a specific query.

            Zsh is the only shell I’ve used that supports it, using Manjaro.

            My Ubuntu 22.04 server using Bash does not. It only supports the basic history that I think you are referring to where you can just browse the history of all your commands at once.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I just feel like a heel using a key with a Windows logo printed on it to do anything of use in Linux.

      • spikespaz@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Me too. Every once in awhile I have to remind myself that it’s not my fault that Lenovo decided to plaster a windows logo on that key. Realistically, that’s everybody’s key, and it was unfair of Microsoft to do that to us in the first place

      • olutukko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not locking behind terminal. It’s just not implementing gui. Which is completely valid since that takes time and effort

        • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Also, writing a GUI wrapper for a terminal-only program is much easier than writing a terminal wrapper for a GUI-only program.

          • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Anyone worth any kind of respect writes the API for an application/CTA first and then uses the same API to power the GUI so it can also be used as a CLI tool.

            Everyone is happy, no elitism or wars.

            • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              What do you mean by “CTA”? How don’t see how “Call to Action” is relevant in this context, seeing how it’s more of a UX design concern than a technical thing. Or does it have some other meaning that does not appear in Google’s first page of results and that ChatGPT is not aware of, and yet “Anyone worth any kind of respect” already implements?

      • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        People are free to write a GUI for it, assuming it’s free software. And you are free to not use a terminal and use any GUI alternatives.

        I mean, locking things behind a GUI definitely isn’t freedom. GUIs are very limited compared to most terminal interfaces.

        • voxel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          it’s just very hard to make a usable ui, and extremely easy to make a great cli interface

        • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Are you kidding? There are literally hundreds of commands in the terminal which don’t have a symmetrical GUI application baked into the OS.

          Why would you create a whole GUI for a simple command such as scp and tail. Literally half of Linux is solely in the terminal

          • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh ok. I guess we have a different definition of what “locked” means. One could definitely make a GUI for simple commands. Who knows, maybe some students somewhere already have.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Eh you rapidly need to know regular expressions to accomplish bulk renaming in the terminal, where some GUI tools like Bulky are a little more powerful for people without chronic eye fatigue.

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yeah I have no idea how to do that too. But I would find it soo nice if Distros would ship bash scripts for all that.

            rename EXPRESSION EXPRESSION
            

            With some help on how to do it and actually helpful tldr. btw:

            cheat(){
            curl cheat.sh/$1
            }
            

            Damn Lemmy…

    • Cyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You should try the ranger file manager, thanks to that I almost don’t use GUI file managers unless I have a headache

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have heard of it, but never got around to it. I suppose if I get tired of grep and find and shell scripts I’ll probably head that way myself. Thanks

  • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    Super + T in my case, but still…

    (shhh 🤫, it’s actually the win key, but don’t let the Linux users hear ya 🤫)

  • vsis@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    tmux gang be like: ctrl-b, c

    screen boomers be like: ctrl-a, c

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t forget us dyslexics though! Cli is rough on that, but gui tends to avoid the errors a typo can cause.

    I swear, having to copy/paste stuff in terminal to avoid typing the damn commands five times is way less convenient.

    I get it, Linux veterans love the terminal because it is efficient and capable. But there’s multiple reasons for a gui interface for common tasks, accessibility being the biggest.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      A lot of Linux users love the terminal because it’s archaic and makes them stand out from the crowd.

      Every thread has people conducting autofellatio by mentioning that one time they opened the terminal in front of Windows users and got called hackers.