• Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I see it as an opportunity to tell people on Threads to leave Threads and use an open platform, such as Mastodon, instead. Then eventually Threads will shut down, because everyone moved :D

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Won’t they have control over their instance though? I’m sure they’re going to run it like Reddit and shadow ban the shit out of their users and also not let them see certain stuff.

        • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Far more likely to lean on their infrastructure advantage and add things like image and video hosting on-platform that the Fediverse can’t do now.

          Then once secured, they can defederate from the actual fediverse and take the whole thing private.

    • DaDragon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why would you want to defederate at all? It’s akin to hiding your head in the sand, except done on a community-wide scale. Just because you can’t see the nazi over there in the bushes doesn’t mean he isn’t squatting there, observing you.

        • atocci@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I might be looking at this wrong, so please let me know why if I am, but I don’t understand the argument that Google killed XMPP. The protocol existed before Google and still existed after Google. I assume the number of people using the XMPP protocol before Google implemented it was small. Then for a little while, Google added all of their users into the network who could now message all the “pure” XMPP users who were already there. After that though, when Google left the protocol and took all its users that weren’t using XMPP before then anyway, how did that kill it? Would you not still have the same group of XMPP users who were there before Google? Anyone you could chat with before you could still chat with now.

      • Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Obviously we will have to see what sort of content comes in from Threads, but knowing Meta, they will be serving a lot of ads in it. So instances will effectively be distributing Meta ads for free. Well free for Meta; the instances will incur additional costs.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s like blocking e-mails from Google. People can’t take a win.

        • sudneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          To be honest, not a great argument, considering that the hidden magic that Google and a handful of big players do, specifically in relation to spam, is what made emails substantially an oligopoly. Today if you want to run an email server, you need to jump 20 hoops to hope your email will ever reach the mailbox of someone on Gmail. Emails were supposed to be a distributed protocol too…

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        He already is, this is all open? They will include people’s numbers in their “awesome wave of the future” and I don’t want that. The more people ignore them and isolate them, the more they won’t have power over everyone.

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          What are “people’s numbers”? What power would they have if we didn’t defederate?

          • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            Dude, facebook is evil, we all know that. I have no idea how they plan to take over the fediverse, but they’re planning it. Do you remember when they first announced and then everyone suddenly started calling it the threadiverse? They have plans, hold on to your seat.

            • Aatube@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              What is the worse case scenario for me, a person living on kbin? What the heck could they do to ever possibly affect us when we can just pull the plug on them anytime?

              • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                by user @OtakuAltair@lemm.ee

                If there’s one company you should preemptively block, it’s Facebook. They have a track record of destroying anything and everything they touch and there is zero reason to think it won’t be the same this time. From this post:

                They aren’t some new, bright-eyed group with no track record. They’re a borderline Machiavellian megacorporation with a long and continuing history of extremely hostile actions:

                • Helping enhance genocides in countries
                • Openly and willingly taking part in political manipulation (see Cambridge Analytica)
                • Actively have campaigned against net neutrality and attempted to make “facebook” most of the internet for members of countries with weaker internet infra - directly contributing to their amplification of genocide (see the genocide link for info)
                • Using their users as non-consenting subjects to psychological experiments.
                • Absolutely ludicrous invasions of privacy - even if they aren’t able to do this directly to the Fediverse, it illustrates their attitude.
                • Even now, they’re on-record of attempting to get instance admins to do backdoor discussions and sign NDAs.

                source

                • misk@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  This is a lot of text about Meta being evil which nobody disputes. But you didn’t answer the question.

            • atocci@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I’ve been under the impression people started using the term threadiverse to describe the Lemmy/Kbin side of the fediverse because we exist in Reddit style threads and interaction with microblog style fediverse posts is obtuse at best. We’re practically in a separate bubble over here, and that was the cause of the new term.

              Edit: The first time I saw the term used was when FediDB made a page for tracking Lemmy+Kbin users

              Edit 2: Archive.org link to the Threadiverse page from June 15th, half a month before the Threads name leaked.

              • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I hadn’t heard it once until threads started up. I didn’t join until the great migration, so maybe earlier people used it, but I had only seen fediverse to describe it.

                • atocci@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I think FediDB coined the term. It definitely existed before Threads had an official name though.

                  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I don’t disagree because I don’t know. Regardless, I hadn’t seen anyone use it until threads started up.

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            They certainly have the choice to migrate. If they don’t want to it’s their problem. Fediverse wasn’t meant to be a wide open connect with anyone anywhere unconditionally network, if you want that go to Nostr (it’s filled with Right wing trolls and crypto/nft bros for that very reason). It’s meant to allow for instances to communicate and share content while still being run independently of one another. That also includes the ability to block other servers.

            • Aatube@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Facebook and the like certainly aren’t filled with right wing trolls and the fediverse is a very niche thing. They have the choice, but they might not even know it.