• Steve Jobs faked full signal strength and swapped devices during the first iPhone demo due to fragile prototypes and bug-riddled software.

• Engineers got drunk during the presentation to calm their nerves.

• Despite the challenges, Jobs successfully completed the 90-minute demonstration without any noticeable issues.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is old news. We all know this. These were prototypes and still buggy but Steve knew he had to present it first, ASAP, to the public to earn and keep the excitement.

    It was a gamble they worked. People were super exited and for months the anticipation built resulting in a strong launch with massive sales.

    Even to this day, it’s that presentation they keeps the fans buying.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wonder where we’d be if the iPhone was a flop. Android was well in development, but as an independent company, the success of the iPhone is what prompted Google to buy Android a year later

      • Xatolos@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Google bought Android in 2005. The iPhone was announced in 2007. The iPhone didn’t have anything to do with Google and Android. Google had a slower hardware start because it has to convince companies to switch from making Windows Phones to Android Phones.

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yes but the first android prototype was a blackberry clone with horizontal tiny screen and all physical keyboard. The iPhone changed everything even if on paper was worse (no apps, ultra closed, expensive on contract)

          For example only for the specs the HTC universal was better in every single part and it launched two years earlier. Bigger screen, higher resolution, full keyboard, lots of buttons, stylus, 3g modem, expandable memory, replaceable battery, an operating system that allowed to install any app. But then the user experience…

          • Xatolos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, that is Steve Job’s attempt to having re-write history to make Apple look better. The truth is, the prototype you are referring to was called “Sooner”, but at the same time, they were making a prototype called “Dream” (in 2006) that was a full touchscreen.

            https://www.osnews.com/story/27481/sooner-prototype-dropped-well-before-the-iphone-announcement/

            On top of this, phones were already moving to full touch screens. Windows Mobile 2005 was designed for touchscreen only (MS attempt was the Start menu on the bottom), but it wasn’t a requirement and companies wanted to play it safe. After that came the LG Prada which was a full touchscreen phone.

      • danielbln@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Android’s interface was all BlackBerry in terms of UI too. The full touch control came after iPhones launch.

        • Railison@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Phone I remember using Symbian on my N95. It was really pushed to the limits on that phone and it showed

      • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh no, stop the presses! They missed a C! ⚠️ Their whole argument is invalid!