• slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Seems like corporate greed can’t go a week without enshitting on a open source project.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nah, c suite was pretty clearly in the right here. Dude left because he was pissed that a vulnerability got assigned a CVE instead of just… Not informing anyone so they could quietly fix it.

      • Bene7rddso@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s an experimental feature. It doesn’t need a bugfix release because you’re not supposed to run it in production, and it’s just a DoS, not privilege escalation or something

      • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Have you looked into the CVE? Apparently it is a non issue. You could use it to dos a service that have an experimental feature enabled, which is disabled by default, on a non stable Version. I understand the dev. CVE should be for serious issues. And they alerted their users over an email list

        It can be used for dos, as it is crashing workers, but they will be restarted anyway.