• kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Apple Car was the hint the wheels fell off, because it was out of scope for Apple’s focus. And the Vision Pro is the next biggest one, because Steve haaaaaaated wearable computing.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      he also hated non-skeuomorphic design, and yet here we are for the better in a world where we’ve moved on from that dated concept

      just because he didn’t like something doesn’t make it wrong for apple to pursue

  • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah but in a person meetings are at an all time high and anonymous sticks of deoderant being left on peoples’ desks is at an all time low.

    • muse@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Just nothing but pages of “exploit and abuse engineers”

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Behind the Bastards just did a great series on him.

        I’d never really understood how he could have killed himself with his fruitarian nonsense until I listened, but once you get the pattern of behavior all laid out, well.

        RIP, bozo.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        I never understood the Steve Jobs worship. We knew he was a shithead bully long before he died

      • muse@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Wozniak, with Jobs at Atari - tamarian for getting taken advantage of in business

  • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lol, the crack appeared as soon after his death. Steve Jobs : no ipad air, no dividend for the share holders.

    Guess what been announced in the months following his death.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Steve Jobs was a piece of shit human being who contributed nothing to technology.

    That said, he was a hell of a skilled bullshitter/marketer. Most people fucking looooove to be bullshitted, and Americans more than most.

    It’s why we elect virtually no wonks/technocrats, even though thats who we should elect almost exclusively. We’d rather some snake oil motherfucker sell us on magical lies while telling us we’re pretty.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’ve never complimented, or defended Steve Jobs before, because he was a grade A piece of shit…but, Steve Jobs transformed technology precisely because he was a phenomenal salesman, with a great eye for technical talent.

      Just because he wasn’t an engineer, doesn’t change the fact that he forged Apple into what it became, and that absolutely contributed to modern technology - for better, and worse.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Just because he wasn’t an engineer, doesn’t change the fact that he forged Apple into what it became,

        I think the big complaint about Jobs is not the lack of engineering skills, but that he got where he did through deception, taking advantage of people, and often treating folks like garbage. Many of us view him as unworthy of celebrating, because the ends don’t justify the means.

        (There’s also the fact that what Apple became was not all good, but perhaps that’s a separate discussion.)

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I think marketers should get to take credit for ad campaigns they create, and engineers should get to take credit for technology they create.

        Capitalists just want to take the credit for what others do. Societal leeches. I don’t buy into their false narrative that providing the means of production they hoard out of greed means they deserve most to all of the credit for what they permit talented people to engineer and produce by the swear of their brow and the migraines of their solutions.

        We should be rewarding the Teslas of the world for what they invent, and punishing the Edisons that would claim other’s inventions as their own. But we suck, so we won’t.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Moving goalpost?

          You said he didn’t contribute to technology, so I pointed out that he’s responsible for Apple becoming what it became, which itself transformed technology.

          Now, you’re saying he shouldn’t get technical credit for…making the iPhone?

          Okay…I never said he should…but it you want to go down that path, he was very hands-on with in the design processes for two of their most pivotal products: the iMac and iPod.

          Again, he was a grade-A douche bag, who died a fucking hilariously stupid death, but that doesn’t erase, or override his impact.

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think the argument is that the motivations society allowed him under capitalism are what drew him to do what he did, not just that he was some brilliant asshole but that he wanted to own the work those beneath him had done.

            Lots of us who have spent our lives being told “yeahuh but that’s how it’s supposed to work!” probably have a hard time grappling the concept that just because it turns out good sometimes doesn’t mean we can’t do better.

            So to the original point of the rebuttal - we’re lucky it only turned out like it did, and not way way worse (and some other high-on-capital folks have been busy proving that lately…)

          • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            If you want to congratulate his corpse for what he didn’t engineer or design, go ahead.

            • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              It has nothing to do with congratulating.

              You made a false statement, and then moved the goalpost (motte and bailey) when I pointed it out.

              Simple as that.

    • parachaye@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      After listening to the recent Behind the Bastards episode on him, yeah absolutely. It’s amazing his legacy isn’t judged more harshly.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        He’s one of those people who died at the right time to preserve their own legacies, before public reckonings for non illegal bad behavior became common.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I guess he died more or less pre-Twitter, so that’s something. He’d have a different legacy otherwise.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I work in tech and specialize in Apple hardware. I get really sick of industry folks talking about Jobs as being inspiring and other nonsense. No, he was an asshole and we should not celebrate him.

  • Vaggumon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    The cracks have been visible for a very long time, most fanboys don’t want to see them though.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The cracks in this case are really that governments will no longer support the model that Apple created.

  • e8d79@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Maybe Apple will have their Balmer moment but, as much as I would like to see that, I don’t expect it any time soon.

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Big companies with no vision of the future are often ripe for disruptive tech to harvest. We’ll see what happens. The apple “visio pro”" is not the future of the company.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This article is garbage. The only thing that Steve Jobs did was have ideas and enough narcissism to force them on other people. Engineers and designers far smarter than he did the actual work.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    People need to stop holding Jobs up as some deity of tech. He was a marketing and hype man that was in the right place at the right time and knew how to take advantage of that luck. Nothing more, nothing less. It is equally possible his leadership style would have squandered the opportunities Apple has had since his death had it been him and not Cook in charge.

    By any metric other than “line must always go up” Apple is doing just fine.

    “Oh no, they haven’t found another multi hundred billion dollar product to release since the iPhone, even though there are no signs that the iPhone won’t continue to be a very profitable business for years and years to come…better go dig up Steve jobs, shove a stick up his back, magic his corpse back to life, and beg him to save the shareholders profit margins”, the horror.

    • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      He was very much the Elon Musk of his times, and it’s very possible he would have gone down the same route of extremist views and decisions that completely failed because of his egoism.

      • machinin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        He died because he didn’t listen to his doctor’s advice. That is somewhat extreme.

        • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Had pancreatitis because of his diet. A diet in which he thought would magically avoid creating body odor.

          It turned into cancer. He lucked out that it was a rare form of treatable pancreatic cancer with a 90% survival rate 5 years out. Which is abnormal as most forms of pancreatic are essentially a death sentence. Survival rate past 3 years is under 10% for the more common variants.

          Stuck to his diet anyway. Ignored his doctors. Died to an illness he had a 90% chance of beating because he knew better.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Jobs was the fucking cracks. The reason why zoomers have no fucking idea where their files are on their computer are because of the shitty attitude instilled into iphones/ipods.

    He started the entire fucking enshittification trend and everyone ate his asshole like peaches.

    • tapo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You can extend this argument to saying everyone should master the command line. They’re all interfaces. There’s no “right way” to use a computer.

      Jobs turned the computer into a product used by everyday people who don’t give a shit about how it works, and that’s fine. That’s empowering because it lowers the barrier to entry.

      That said, we’ve been in a much worse “eternal September” since the iPhone shipped.

        • parachute@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Can you expand a bit more on this? What makes it not an interface?

          I am an android and windows person (would switch to Linux in a heartbeat if my CAD worked on there) and pretty tech savvy, even run my own servers. So I hate the fact that things are getting so dumbed down but I can’t understand why it’s just an interface would be not true.

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’ll take a swing at this one.

            A good interface has well defined inputs and outputs. A lot of interactions with iOS/MacOS software/applications have decently defined inputs via their UIs, but finding the outputs of those UIs can be a Sysiphysian effort. Figuring out where those outputs are beyond the defaults like “downloads from a browser end up in the Downloads folder” or “documents saved in the Pages app end up in the Documents” folder is frequently non-trivial.

            It ends up being that the easiest way to find a file is to just open the original app you created it in, and find it in it’s history or whatever. To a non-technical person, this creates the impression that the only way to interact with those files is with the original app it was created in, which ends up limiting what people think they can do with their devices, and creates a bit of a walled garden effect.

            So I suppose that the blanket statement of “it’s not an interface” isn’t completely fair. What is fair though, is to say that “it’s a bad interface”, if the average user can’t readily find said interface’s output.

            • parachute@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think I understand what you mean now, if it was an interface then it should be possible to use a separate but similar interface to access the output but here there is only one non-PITA way. Eg. If there was a competing galleries app on iOS it should be able to see all the photos. Is that roughly the thinking? Makes sense to me and thanks for taking the time to type that out.

              • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                yep, zalgotext basically did it for me. One other thing is that when you try to access files on an ipod through a non apple computer, it still uses tree based file structures, but the individual files, names, and locations are all garbled (eg : your Rancid album track 3 is in the same folder as your rush 2112 overture, but the rest of those albums are fuck knows where).

                I had a joke that the original iphone wasn’t turing complete because you couldn’t run programs on it not from the istore.