AbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-28 天前Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isexternal-linkmessage-square349linkfedilinkarrow-up1874arrow-down143file-text
arrow-up1831arrow-down1external-linkApple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isAbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-28 天前message-square349linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarereksas@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down2·9 天前does ANY model reason at all?
minus-square4am@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35arrow-down1·9 天前No, and to make that work using the current structures we use for creating AI models we’d probably need all the collective computing power on earth at once.
minus-squareMiles O'Brien@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·9 天前… So you’re saying there’s a chance?
minus-squareRefurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 天前That sounds really floppy.
minus-squareauraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-29 天前Define reason. Like humans? Of course not. They lack intent, awareness, and grounded meaning. They don’t “understand” problems, they generate token sequences.
minus-squareMrLLM@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 天前I think I do. Might be an illusion, though.
does ANY model reason at all?
No, and to make that work using the current structures we use for creating AI models we’d probably need all the collective computing power on earth at once.
… So you’re saying there’s a chance?
10^36 flops to be exact
That sounds really floppy.
Define reason.
Like humans? Of course not. They lack intent, awareness, and grounded meaning. They don’t “understand” problems, they generate token sequences.
as it is defined in the article
I think I do. Might be an illusion, though.