Nice.
That’s exactly what an LLM trained on Reddit would say.
Are you AI? You have to tell me if you’re AI, it’s the law.
I’m required by law to inform my neighbours that I am AI.
deleted by creator
Seems reasonable to me. If you’re using AI then you should be required to own up to it. If you’re too embarrassed to own up to it, then maybe you shouldn’t be using it.
I’m stoked to see the legal definition of “AI”. I’m sure the lawyers and costumed clowns will really clear it all up.
Prosecution: “Your Honor, the definition of artificial is ‘made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally,’ and as all human beings are themselves produced by human beings, we are definitionally artificial. Therefore, the actions of an intelligent human are inherently AI.”
Defense: “The defense does not argue this point, as such. However, our client, FOX News, could not be said to be exhibiting ‘intelligence.’ Artificial they may be, but AI they are clearly not. We rest our case.”
Prosecution: “Your Honor, the definition of artificial is ‘made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally,’ and as all human beings are themselves produced by human beings, we are definitionally artificial. Therefore, the actions of an intelligent human are inherently AI.”
Defense: “The defense does not argue this point, as such. However, our client, FOX News, could not be said to be exhibiting ‘intelligence.’ Artificial they may be, but AI they are clearly not. We rest our case.”
And if it hallucinates?
Straight to jail
That depends.
Devils advocate here. Any human can also hallucinate. Some of them even do it as a recreational activity
Yeah, and the people who pay those people tend to get really mad if they do that at work.
Pretty sure that people who hallucinate are kidnapped and thrown in cages.
So does the EU AI act
It’s comforting to know that politicians in the EU also have no clue what “AI” is.
Why do you say that
Same old corporations will ignore the law, pay a petty fine once a year, and call it the cost of doing business.
Okay, but when can the law straight up ban companies who don’t comply with the law from operating in the state instead of just slapping them on the wrist and telling them “no” the same way a pushover parent tells their child “no”. Especially after they just ignore the law.
Can’t do anything that might negatively impact business.
But Peter Thiel said regulating AI will bring the biblical apocalypse. ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ
deleted by creator
VPN set to California?
Oooooooh! As long as California doesn’t do those stupid ID verification laws, that might be the place to set your VPN from now on.
Move to California.
Probably will get it anyway, companies don’t like to build and maintain software for two different markets so they tend to just follow the regulations of the strictest market, especially if those regulations don’t really cut into there bottom line like this one.
I am of the firm opinion that if a machine is “speaking” to me then it must sound a cartoon robot. No exceptions!
I propose that they must use vocaloid voices or that old voice code that Wasteland 3 uses for the bob the robot looking guys.
I want my AI to sound like a Speak & Spell.
Any word on the 3 laws of robotics?
“AI” is already being used for genocide in palestine and probably elsewhere. Not to mention other “applications”.
So no luck on the laws of robotics.
When I read that shit as a kid, I thought Asimov’s laws of robotics were like natural laws, so that it was just naturally impossible for robots to behave otherwise. That never made any sense to me so I thought Asimov was just full of shit.
If I’m not AI, can I lie and pretend that I’m AI? I’m AI, btw.
What if I just use AI to generate all my content and then put an intern in a chair to launder it as original human thoughts?
Now that’s smart!
What happened to Old California?
Destroyed by bombs in 2077.
I feel like bombing Night City would raise the property values.
NCR is exactly what came to mind reading the headline lol
I think it was conquered.
, btw I’m ai after every message
If you ask ChatGPT, it says it’s guidelines include not giving the impression it’s a human. But if you ask it be less human because it is confusing you, it says that would break the guidelines.
ChatGPT doesn’t know its own guidelines because those aren’t even included in its training corpus. Never trust an LLM about how it works or how it “thinks” because fundamentally these answers are fake.
