• AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    The issues could cascade beyond the design. The auto manufacturing industry operates on strict production schedules. Though it builds in time to validate and test whatever new features come in each new model, the sudden intro of a design change late in the process could throw off the delicate timetable.

    FFS, it’s a bloody door handle, not full self driving tech. Author is full of BS.

    • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      A lot of upvotes here, and I think they’re ignoring how much is involved in production pipelines and the overhead of sourcing suppliers. That said, Musk has a habit of throwing in last minute changes and the company manages to handle those but much like self driving they ship late

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah let’s see, if the handle would have to be a different shape, they may need a different cutout for the door, different handle moulds, different mechanical parts, updated electronics… does anyone have a fucking clue how difficult it is to program one of those robotic arms? How expensive new moulds are? Any other potential knock-on effects this may have on the internal design?

        People with the mentality of ‘it’s just a small plug at the bottom of the pool, how bad could it possibly be if we removed it’

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah let’s see, if the handle would have to be a different shape, they may need a different cutout for the door, different handle moulds, different mechanical parts, updated electronics… does anyone have a fucking clue how difficult it is to program one of those robotic arms? How expensive new moulds are? Any other potential knock-on effects this may have on the internal design?

        People with the mentality of ‘it’s just a small plug at the bottom of the pool, how bad could it possibly be if we removed it’

        • Honytawk@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          They only have to redesign a new door, not an entire car.

          Sure, it isn’t as easy adding a dent so you can grab the handle. But it is a lot easier and cheaper than designing a new door, which they do for every new model.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      You do not know or believe how much shit has to be pipelined to get a simple change on a car design going on the market. If you have knowledge about computers, you quickly notice that the hardware and software running in a car are OLD. I’ve seen cars sold as new with processors so old, they are “no longer recommended for new designs”. This is because every single thing has to be tested and approved to death in a car. Sometimes several times over.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is because every single thing has to be tested and approved to death in a car.

        This is tesla though, how much testing do they actually do before passing it to customers for free QA?

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The part that the law demands has probably been tested. But I think the US is less stringent with that than our EU.