• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 days ago

    ISPs route data packets between IP addresses; they don’t get to see the content of what I send/receive (it’s encrypted), and they don’t get domain info without deep packet inspection, because I don’t use their DNS servers.

    It’s more like sometimes the city will put up speed cameras and ALPRs — but does that make them responsible for speeders?

    You have a point about the DMCA though; I’ve had videos monetized by a third party because of music I wrote and performed myself — turned out, the company was stealing MY music and I got dinged for it.

    • meathappening@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      To be clear, I’m not saying it’s a good argument. OP just grossly mischaracterized it.

      The main issue with this is that it would either A. Be massively open to abuse in the same way that YouTube is now, but would come with greater penalties in that you can lose Internet access. Or B. Force your ISP to do a copyright analysis every time they receive a report.

      Every illegally downloaded book is a lost sale

      This is straight out of 2007. What an awful position to take.

      And that’s fucking wild about someone fighting you over your own music. The DMCA is a fucking joke.