• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    It’s fucking wild. Like, I love Steam, don’t get me wrong, but holy shit just suck less (edit: than other stores do) and charge less (edit: of devs) and you could gobble up a lot of that market share. But none of them do.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      24 days ago

      Notably Epic charges less than 30% (something like 12% IIRC) to try to get more of that market. They even give away games. But their app is still inferior so it gets less use.

      • Vespair@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Because Epic doesn’t care about end users and won’t add necessary end user features like reviews.

        It’s cool that Epic wants to pay developers more, but the way they disregard the consumer makes the platform non-viable

    • underscores@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      company: “I want what steam is making and more” shareholders: “brilliant”

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      24 days ago

      Most other competitors charge less than steam, but steam has a clause which prevents devs from putting their games cheaper elsewhere. This is the real big shitty move made by valve, otherwise they do mostly everything right. I hope someone challenges this clause in a court of law someday, it looks very monopolistic to me