Halfway through he describes this as malicious compliance with the “right to repair” law. Apple and others are making a mockery of the law.

  • sqgl@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    OK I accept the analogies are not good equivalents.

    It is not necessarily true that everyone has already paid for the seat warmer hardware. The car may cost the same as if it didn’t have the hardware installed. Certainly the owners were happy enough with the car price to buy it without seat warming option.

    The manufacturer may find it cheaper to just install it for everyone and wear the cost in the hope that enough people will pay for the warmer to be enabled.

    Of course it is possible that everyone pays for the hardware anyhow but it is not necessarily the case.

    • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is such a weird hill to die on for someone who claims to be pro-consumer

      • sqgl@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You make it sound like football team loyalty.

        I am pro-fairness, not pro-consumer. I don’t think the consumers are justified in their entitlement in this case.

        • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah my bad, despite having been coerced into a transportation economy that forces us to purchase multi-thousand dollar machines, I forgot to consider if we’re asking too much of automotive manufacturers when we request to not pay a premium for comfort that literally costs them nothing since they already sold it to us.

          • sqgl@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            You wouldn’t have a warm seat anyhow if they only installed the seat for prepaid customers but it is possible that those customers would pay more because it would cost more to make two sets of cars. Or four sets if optional fancy suspension is done that way, or eight sets if you include digital radio, or sixteen if…

            Much of the cost is R&D, not just the physical item.

            Do you think all music should be free because it is already online and you downloading an album doesn’t cost the artist even one cent?

            • architect@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              I bought a car. That means I bought every piece in that car. You locking me out of the hardware i bought is me not owning my own car. You are not so dense you think artists that make music you didn’t buy yet are the same as the car manufacturer that sold you a physical car.

              You are not that stupid nor dense so quit wasting everyone’s time.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t see how you could possibly think it’s okay to sell something to someone while telling them oh but technically you didn’t buy everything inside it, that’s an extra fee.

      Come on you can’t be so broken you can’t see a clear scam right in front of you.

      It should be illegal and if any of our institutions had teeth it would be.