I am standing on the corner of Harris Road and Young Street outside of the Crossroads Business Park in Bakersfield, California, looking up at a Flock surveillance camera bolted high above a traffic signal. On my phone, I am watching myself in real time as the camera records and livestreams me—without any password or login—to the open internet. I wander into the intersection, stare at the camera and wave. On the livestream, I can see myself clearly. Hundreds of miles away, my colleagues are remotely watching me too through the exposed feed.

Flock left livestreams and administrator control panels for at least 60 of its AI-enabled Condor cameras around the country exposed to the open internet, where anyone could watch them, download 30 days worth of video archive, and change settings, see log files, and run diagnostics.

Archive: http://archive.today/IWMKe

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    Again? How insecure are these things? I am honestly wondering how easy it would be to get into one and shut down the entire system.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I studied coding for a while (and it has been a while since I punched in code), but I never coded a virus. I am hesitant to ask an LLM to do it since I have no idea if it’ll work, and I also need to test it to see if it works first. Not sure if I have any sacrificial electronics to do that.

    • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s obvious that these guys are fucking amateur hour Techbros, running this shitshow as they have. I don’t doubt they’re underpaying and undertraining the contractors they hire to install these things.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    A city in the KC Metro just signed a contract with Flock for drone cameras. Fuck that Big Brother bullshit.

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    I seem to recall an early 00s screed, perhaps by Bruce Schneier or someone of that ilk, suggesting a future in which yes we have surveillance in the public square, but since it’s public, everyone has full access to all the public-place cameras at any time. So you could use it to, say, see around the corner of an alley at night.

  • jmsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Snip their wires, spray paint their lens, or put a hammer on the end of a tall stick. it should be easy to take these things out. Of course don’t do anything or have anything on you that would identify you were in the area at the time of these actions.

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly? Good. These cameras should either be public or dismantled. I’d like to see them dismantled, but worst case scenario is the current one where they’re selectively used by law enforcement

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    iirc they weren’t even the first ones to discover this because there was already someone on the blackmarket selling data collected from exposed cameras and endpoints which included PII of entire police departments.

  • modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is there a directory of these cameras? Or are they gonna make me do all the legwork?

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is kinda insane. I mean if someone was standing outside their window with a notepad writing down everything they see and hear people would be creeped the fuck out. But put a camera there and the same asshole is sitting on a computer desk in a different city they are ok with?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      For your detractors, I’d like to point out that nothing stated here in untrue.

      The problem is feeding 10’s of thousands of video streams, from a single entity, to the police and government. And now they’re using AI to sort the data, which is a powerful use case for AI.

      Were we to magically feed all the webcams and doorbells and security cameras to a single source, it would still be a technological mess to sort out. Flock’s system is purpose built to track us.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not a privacy problem.
      It is a stalking problem.

      We’re using the wrong words.

      If we end up getting privacy in public, the police will then use it to stop people from filming them in public. That is the long-term goal of setting this in motion.