Man whose finances are reliant on scheme really wishes you’d all stop talking about downsides of scheme, more at 11
I say relentless Jensen Huang is hurting society and has “done a lot of damage.”
Not enough negativity, we need
Respect is earned, not granted. You don’t earn respect by telling people to glue pepperoni onto their pizza, or saying there are 5 R’s in strawberry.
relentless negativity aroundAI is hurting society and has “done a lot of damage”it’s hurting profits!
The shorter the headline the better 👍
Define damage. Damage to shareholders and C-suite executives or damage to the rest of the economy and environment?
Hey guys, I think the guy who stands to make a mint on all this AI stuff has a point, we should be nicer to the plagiarism machine
I think he’s more concerned about losing a mint, which is probably the more likely result.
Says the guy who runs a 4,9 trillion dollar company mainly because of AI, what damage? WTF!
Lol. Negativity around AI has done damage, but draining water and electricity in magnitude not seen before has not?
P-lease
Not to mention there is no answer to the elephant in the room… What happens to an economy where workers have been stripped of yet more jobs and all of manufacturing is in China?
Oh, sorry. Is it negative to talk about the needs of millions of people and not our thoughtful billionaire class?
Let’s also not mention the potential data collection/spyware-esque potential. Noooo, that’d never happen. More negativity in my imagination. I should go get a prescription for that…
With you at every step.
Oh, and about that prescription. I know an old French prescription that would suit our needs just fine
Oh fuck off with that. Y’all are promoting the technology with the promise of replacing human jobs. What did you think the response would be?
That is not to mention building it by literally stealing the wealth of human thought and then being surprised that we’re mad you want to sell it back to us with brand new monthly fees. Fuck off with all of that.
All AI models should be required to be open sourced to compensate humanity for this theft of our labor and ideas.
They’re taking care of that for you. Without ads, they don’t have enough income to stay afloat. With ads, they can’t compete with open source models.
I would have a lot less negativity around AI if the mag 7 and all AI companies agreed to sign a contract to be nationalized once they have automated a significant amount of jobs, with their profits to be used for a national basic income. I would be much more positive in that case, Jensen. Give it some thought.
…but–but that would be COMMUNISM!!! 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
/s
Let me rewrite that: Man who makes trillions manufacturing Ai hardware, says “people expressing how shitty Ai is and how it makes life harder” is going to cause me to lose money.
Its hilarious how hard tech bros are panicking over underwhelming AI revenue after they bet the entire economy on it.
“Won’t somebody think of the CEOs?”
