• MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    19 days ago

    Pretty sure Mozilla has the numbers on how many installations each OS has, so it’s probably a legitimate decision. HOWEVER, if they want to maintain their position on Linux, I highly recommend changing the default behavior of Ctrl+Shift+C to match how it works in Helium, where it simply copies the selected content instead of opening Developer Mode, which cannot be closed again using the same keystroke.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        19 days ago

        Ah the classic Linux community response to any complaint.

        1. The default either actively ignores what every other software does or purposely uses something other than everything else for no apparent reason.
        2. Someone brings up the fact that it makes no sense why it’s different and how it makes the user experience worse.
        3. Someone else recommends a half baked solution that still doesn’t really solve the problem and doesn’t address the fact that the specific weirdness being default is the issue. So it ignores the actual complaint and only provides a half solution.
        4. Nothing is ever done to address the issue and it remains for decades constantly annoying new users and being one of thousands of small issues that turn potential curious new users away as they accumulate.
        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 days ago

          The fuck you want us to do about it? We don’t have commit access to firefox’s codebase.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Why is that persons response considered the community response?

          Ive been using Linux for 20 years so… Can we change that shortcut please?

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Interesting. And yet it’s still incomplete. F6 and Alt+D both do the same thing (focus the address bar), so there’s at least one line missing and definitely at least one column.

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 days ago

      What’s wrong with Ctrl+C to copy? Its the default shortcut on pretty much everything except terminals.

      • MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        18 days ago

        Whats wrong with using the metric system to represent quantities? Its the default on pretty much everything except fueling planes or operating satellites. /s

        The conflict arises from having two different defaults for the same action. Since users frequently switch between these environments, the lack of a universal shortcut causes constant friction.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          The key issue is that the request is to change behavior in one place (browser) to match that of a rare case (terminal), causing a mismatch with the frequent case (office suites, mail programs, …). The terminal is the odd one out, not the browser, and ought be the one to change the default for the reason you provide.

          In practice, a terminal is a special case and not just a text input window, and current convention is that Ctrl + C aborts / cancels.

          (You could of course have a duplicate hotkey, but now you are inconsistent w.r.t. other browsers, and there will be someone else who will be annoyed by the difference)

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah the person who put Developer Mode on that shortcut… Must have never used linux.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Since most of Lemmy users are Linux fans, this headline sounds nice but is a bit misleading if you read the original post from Mozilla:

    How can I get the newest features of Firefox?

    If you want to keep your Firefox up to date, with all the latest features and security updates, you need to upgrade your operating system to Windows 10 or higher. In some cases, Microsoft may require newer hardware in order to support the newer operating system. After upgrading, you can easily reinstall Firefox and keep all of your settings.

    Or, if your current hardware can’t handle Windows 10 or higher for some reason, you can switch to a Linux-based operating system. The vast majority of Linux distributions come with Firefox as the default browser. Please see the support websites for the version of Linux that you’re interested in.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      18 days ago

      sounds nice but is a bit misleading

      To me it even sounds kind of scary. If they are telling users you need to switch your OS to continue using our app, that is going to isolate users and further decrease user base and market share. And apps that no one uses usually die. So for people who like Firefox, it doesn’t sound so nice. I’m also a Linux user, but I’m not sure if this is a positive way to drive users to Linux. (Thought it does mention windows 10 upgrade hardware requirement limitations, which might be a positive way to drive users to Linux, thanks Microsoft.)

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 days ago

        What a bad take.
        Are you really asking Mozilla to restart supporting Windows XP as well because the web browser is used for some embedded application, too?

        And so what?
        If the user liked Firefox, they will need to switch the OS anyway. Doesnt matter if Apple, MS or Linux. Firefox is present in all them.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 days ago

          man I’m facing either needing to get a new pc in THIS market to use 10, or find an entire new professional software workflow to do my job. professional video on Linux isn’t real. hobbysist video sure, but pro video work with partners just isn’t realistic on linux.

          this is the first thing that’s actually pushing me hard.

                • village604@adultswim.fan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  I don’t think they were talking about firefox. I think they were just complaining in general. The bit about needing to buy new equipment is what gives it away that they’re talking about not having TPM2.0.

                  Edit: Just saw that they confirmed my guess under a different response to me.

          • Robin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            18 days ago

            Yoy are doing professional video work on a PC old enough that it can’t run Windows 10?

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        that is going to isolate users and further decrease user base and market share.

        Seems in line with what Mozilla’s board of <insert pun that rhymes with directors here 'cos i’m tired> has been doing for ages, so yeah.

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’m not very techie, so when I took my brand new Lenovo (cheap) laptop from w11 to Linux mint, it really felt like an achievement. I haven’t used a command terminal since college, and I straight up made a bootable usb and wiped w11

    • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Nice!!! But I feel those entry distros could do a lot more to be more user friendly, there are many edge cases where you still need to use a terminal and have some understanding of the OS. We need a truly GUI only distro with more wizards, and automatic repair so more people flee to Gnu/Linux

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        Edge cases are well, on the edge and sometimes you just need to let them go. You can’t always be everything to everyone.

      • brownsugga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        TBH i really like that i had to get a bit techie again to make the switch. learning to use the terminal a little bit has ignited something in me, and the fact that linux doesnt track my shit has made me way more privacy conscious

  • hitstun@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    The PC Gamer article’s title also says “upgrade or”. That’s a heck of a detail to editorialize out of the title.

    From the Mozilla post it cites:

    After this, no security updates will be provided and you are strongly encouraged to upgrade to a supported Microsoft Windows version.

    Or, if your current hardware can’t handle Windows 10 or higher for some reason, you can switch to a Linux-based operating system. The vast majority of Linux distributions come with Firefox as the default browser.

    I agree switching to Linux is the better option. I want to try Bazzite.

    • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Bazzite’s excellent, just be aware going in that it’s an immutible distro and some stuff may be different than you’re used to.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 days ago

        It will be different anyway, as it is a completely different operating system that has nothing in common with windows.

          • p0358@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            Except it will prevent you from mutating many of its system files. I mean it’s not a good argument for a former Windows user, unless they get a sudden urge to tinker with all possible system files on Linux (which is possible to do on immutable systems in one way or another, but it’s much harder and not as straightforward)

            • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              True, but a lot of Linux help and guides are based around normal distros where they won’t work

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        The worst part of immutable versions is when you go searching for help, you need to be careful about answers that might be presented to you.

        For example, if I search for "how to install nVidia drivers in Fedora Kinonite 43, the first returns can often be for Fedora Plasma 43. Those terminal commands for Plasma won’t work for Kinonite. And even updating is different. Instead of sudo dnf update for regular Fedora desktops, you need to type rpm-ostree update for atomic versions.

    • ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Bazzite is amazing, nearly bulletproof even?

      I had a few times where it booted to the grub emergency shell, but it literally just fixed itself. Just reboot and it uses the other A/B slot. And the next update attempt just fixes whatever the problem was. That’s only happened twice in the last 5 months since I switched. Most longtime Linux users should be very familiar with the grub emergency shell, but I’ve never been on a distro where it just fixes itself. I don’t ever have to think or worry about updates, it’s just a reliable daily driver. It’s sick.

      As people have said, Bazzite is immutable. You can install system packages/libraries if you absolutely need to, but you really should run your custom stuff in a Distrobox instead. Distrobox is preinstalled, supports graphical apps automatically, and most of the time you won’t even notice it’s not your real OS.

      I think Bazzite is more stable and usable than Windows now. I’m tempted to switch my parents to it, it’s been much more fault tolerant than Windows 11.

  • dismay3915@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    One of the main places windows is used, like it or not, are organizations and companies. Especially small ones. Specially ones that are not in wealthy countries. And the only thing that keeps them from switching to linux is microsoft office. (Most importantly Word, excel).

    My company has ~20 people and I would switch them over to linux if it wasn’t for word and excel.

    While libreoffice is great on it’s own, companies send eachother xlsx and docx files. And libreoffice isnt great at reading or writing them. Specially complex ones. I don’t think it’s much of libre office’s fault, but more the shitty incompatible, unstandardized microsoft formats.

    Currently I’m the only Linux user in the team, and I constantly advocate Linux, but I know if anybody switches, compatibility with microsoft office is going to be a problem. I can take the risk with the tech team but not the office section (hr, sales, secretary accounting etc.) really.

    • sonofearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 days ago

      Try onlyoffice and slowly try to shift to libreoffice with open document formats. Or just skip that part and move everyone to the web versions of office. Also if you guys are on office 2010, the last time I ran it via wine, it worked completely fine.

    • rushmonke@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      Microsoft dominance in businesses is part of what’s making me think all businesses are in cahoots with each other to make sure the only businesses that are successful are ones that take power away from the public.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      There is stuff Office 360 or whatever is called to that online Microsoft Office can do just fine from Firefox or Chrome based browsers. But if things get overcomplicated, it’s as good or even worse than Libreoffice at handling xlsx, docx documents.

      Even current Office struggles with early Office documents.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    “Most browsers, including Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge, have already ended support for Windows 7, 8 and 8.1.”

    To me Millions of flies can’t be wrong: eat shit. is a crappy argument but at least they’re

    “If your current hardware can’t handle Windows 10 or higher for some reason, you can switch to a Linux-based operating system. The vast majority of Linux distributions come with Firefox as the default browser.”

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 days ago

    thats so weird. if someone is forced to be on win7, no way they gonna change to linux. there has to be some compatibility issue in the background.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    With the list of old Windows vulnerabilities so extensive Firefox could simply just install Linux for users like that.

    Most of them (I assume such VMs don’t use browsers) would just click [Agree] and then [Next] a few times, never knowing what was it about, maybe not even noticing any differences.

    /s

    • IratePirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      So, basically Microsoft’s “we know what’s best for you” style? No. Fuck that, no matter the purpose.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        I was joking.

        I added the “/s” to be extra clear.
        I didn’t think of anyone taking that statement seriously (like how wound it even work?).

        • IratePirate@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 days ago

          Apologies. I’ve seen weirder shit proposed recently. 2025 has severely damaged my sensors responsible for detecting irony, sarcasm and satire.

          As for “how would it work”: on systems as old as Win 7, it would be trivial to escalate privileges and install all kinds of shit.

          • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            I do agree with you, I could have written it significantly better (in my brainhole the notion of a browser/browser dev installing you an OS bcs it would mean less work for them was just funny, but I failed in communicating it).

            Also lol, yeah, 2025 did a number on irony/nutty theories/near future predictions. 2026 is no better, like whym there aren’t any HDDs left, what kind of worldwide catastrophe hit Earth & caused that??

            The install bit - so getting through admin Win would prob be easy (that was the og joke), then the code would have to partition the disk (ok), install Hannah Montana Linux (ok), but then also reboot to that partition - can that be done without Grub on a primary boot partition or the user accessing BIOS?

            • IratePirate@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              can that be done without Grub on a primary boot partition or the user accessing BIOS?

              I was assuming you’d just write GRUB onto the primary disk and set Hannah Montana Linux (lol, excellent choice of distro!) as the only boot option (because who needs os-prober and a selection timeout when you’ve got the best of distros on disk, amirite?).

              I suppose the most problematic part is the partitioning you handwaved as “ok”. Afair, Windows does not allow for live-resizing of the system partition (as it should). But I suppose there are ways around that, particularly if you’ve got another drive or spare partition of adequate size. (OEM recovery partitions come to mind; as much as 10 GB can be enough for a viable Linux system partition.)

              • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                Oh, your are right, I always resized partitions with Knoppix or (something with) GParted (Live).

                Perhaps there is a way to use Windows partition without any reformat, reboot into the same partition but in Linux, finish installing the rest of the packages & clean up Windows file.

                Using them old OEM partitions is a neat idea too.

                I’ll open a ticket with Mozilla.

                • IratePirate@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  Hannah Montana, Knoppix… a man of culture I see…

                  I’ll open a ticket with Mozilla.

                  …who wants to see the world burn!

        • systemglitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          You know there is some dude the thought removing the /s would make that a valid suggestion.

          Thought virus’ are real.

  • RalfWausE@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Well, as an addition to all the calls for switching to Linux:

    Its completely doable to install Windows 11 on unsupported Hardware, using an official ISO from Microsoft and letting the Rufus imager apply a few changes and Win 11 should run on hardware that is about 10 years old or a bit older (i think i have heard Microsoft has removed support for the Core2 generation of CPUs). If you want to get a really clean install the best tool is - i think - tiny11builder which cleans up an official ISO and makes the whole experience of running this OS on older hardware way more pleasant.

    Currently i have a test system (a laptop) with an Celeron N3010 and 4 GB RAM on my desk at work running Windows 11 modified by tiny11builder and it is - while not exactly fast - absolutely useable for classical office tasks.

    • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Its Kind of insane to think about that you have to put so much effort into deshittifying windows 11. At that point its probably easier to switch to Linux (if you dont have anything that forces you to use win 11)

      • RalfWausE@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I personaly am not forced to use Windows, quiet on the contrary - at the moment i am daily driving Haiku. But there is always this odd person in the extended family that cannot switch because of an pigeon breeding management software or some obscure program used for some niche interest… so its nice to have a roadmap to let them keep using an system that keeps getting updated.

  • SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    I like linux and I use it (Raspbian, Zorin, Ubuntu, Arch: diff machines). I also enjoy using Win 8.1 on my Lenovo M93p Tiny (8GB ram), as a Playnite appliance / console. This allows me to play emulated games (Wii, Gamecube, PS2, to about 1.5-2x upscale), ~2013ish era AAA titles (Fallout 3, Just Cause 2, Dead Rising 2, GTA IV) and select indy games (like Donut County, Untitled Goose Game, EXO ONE) all from one device.

    Normally, the advice would be to use something like Bazzite or Batocera (and I agree!)…but given the hardware limitations and the “it just runs” nature of these older Window games (under windows) I’ve had better experiences sticking to Win 8.1.

    YMMV but the “switch to linux cause windows too old” thing has some shades of gray.

    • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      If you play on a machine that is not connected to internet, then by all means there is no reason to switch. But of you are connected to the internet, then those system pose security risks and you would be better off having an up to date system. If Win 10 wasn’t EOL then maybe the advice to upgrade to Win10 would be solid.