• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Wouldn’t that mean ten percent of all crashes in all apps would be caused by bit flips? What makes Firefox special?

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      You can’t effect the number of bit flips your users hardware has, but you can affect how often buggy code corrupts their memory or otherwise crashes your program.

      Let’s say any app will crash about once a year on my machine due to a bit flip. If the app is crap and crashes hundreds of times for other reasons, the bit flip is irrelevant. If the app is robust enough that the bit flip accounts for 10 % of the crashes, that basically means the app is pretty much never crashing due to poor code.

      • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s the way people should be looking at it. It basically means hard crashes are extremely rare in the firefox ecosystem.

        To be fair, I can’t remember the last time a browser crashed on me in general.

        • caschb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          I’ve had Safari of all things crash on me a couple of times. Still, not enough to actually be disruptive.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 days ago

      Anecdotal evidence, but I had both a 13th gen and 14th gen Intel CPU with the bug that caused them to over time, destroy themselves internally.

      The most-user-visible way this initially came up, before the CPUs had degraded too far, was Firefox starting to crash, to the point that I initially used Firefox hitting some websites as my test case when I started the (painful) task of trying to diagnose the problem. I suspect that it’s because Firefox touches a lot of memory, and is (normally) fairly stable — a lot of people might not be too surprised if some random game crashes.

      • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        I had to turn down my block multiplier so that I could play Unreal Engine games. I would suspect that would extend the lifetime. After the underclock I have perfect stability.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      No, they’re saying Firefox uses so much ram they’re far far more likely to be a victim!

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        Laughs in Memory: 46.84 GiB / 62.72 GiB (75%) with (probably) several hundred tabs open

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      It would be interesting to see how this works in Chrome. I would guess that it could be the same - people tend to leave their browsers open with hundreds of tabs and will never reboot their laptops. If you play a random game for 2 hours, bit flips shouldn’t be a problem. But if you keep your browser open for weeks or months with hundreds of tabs, that may cause problems.