I’m also getting my tax advice from Gonzo on LinkedIn.
What a sad state of journalism. Celebrity posted something on social. Opinions are divided. Commenters said this. Others said that. Thanks for looking at our ads.
She may be right, I dunno. I’m criticizing the publication and quality of the story, not the actor and alleged AI influencer.
We need Ja Rule’s opinion on this. Has anyone asked him?
WHERES JA?!
Planning a festival on a desert island?
I don’t think learning how to use. AI is going to save their job. Because AI will do their job there’s nothing for them to do. I’m not saying it right. I’m just saying I don’t think her advice is right.
cool, cool…Hey Reese which LLM’s have you invested in that you’re now advocating more women utilize them? OpenAI? Anthropic?
She’s not stupid. She’s trying to get a return on investment.
I seriously tried looking for a connection with her portfolio’s available online, she seems clean and genuinely just advocating woman to use it.
That’s what it looks like right now, at least in public view.Don’t blame anyone in the slightest for the cynicism though in the current atmosphere.E: Welp, there goes my optimism.
That is also what it looked like back in 2022 when she partnered with World of Women to release NFT’s.
“While the crypto and NFT space is largely dominated by men, there are inspiring leaders like World of Women creating incredible communities for women during this massive shift for media and technology,”
Ugh, I seriously appreciate you ruining my optimism.
Crypto also trades in lockstep with Nvidia which essentially THE AI company now. Coefficient of like ~.8
Neither of those are public yet.
She doesn’t need to be invested in any particular LLM company. If she only bought a world ETF she’s already heavily invested in LLMs.
Even if your unfounded accusation was true, do you think her ROI would change depending on what she says to variety? She is not stupid. You? I have my doubts…
Yes actually, having a celebrity speak favorably about a company to boost sales and/or stock value is a thing, and owning stock in a company is an obvious incentive for a person to want to boost that stock’s value, fucking duh
Openai’s valuation is at 30B dollars and illiterate farmer at the end of the world knows what it is. If you think whatever RW tells pop culture magazine makes a dent in it, one way or the other, you need to recalibrate your tinfoil hat. Fucking duh.
Valuation based on fantastical quantities of bullshit, growing public awareness that bubble will pop sooner rather than later, extremely plausible that tech companies would enlist celebrities to help prop their scheme up as long as they can, cry about it
cry about it
You are the one crying about it, i am laughing at you ;)
Oh hey, i just found i am wasting my time talking to .ml asshole and genocide denier. Fuck off and bye.
I deny genocides that are fictional
I am having such a hard time picking a side here because you’re both kinda fucked lol but 🍿🍿🍿
ARR is around 30b, valuation is over 800b.
my bad, thanks for the correction. she is even more unlikely to make a dent in that, though.
Why do advertisers use celebrities in their advertisements? Shits and giggles?
advertisers use celebrities that fit the size of their business. if your business is right now literally taking over the word and it is dependent on statements of presidents and top 10 billionaires in the world, then reese witherspoon does not really play in this league and chance she will make any noticable dent in its popularity or evaluation is astronomically low.
have you noticed that celebrities also have opinions and sometimes share them for free? when a celebrity speaks for war, are you asking “how much have you invested in military industrial complex?” when they speak against war, are you asking “how much have you invested in red cross?” when celebrity speaks about education, are you asking “have you recently invested in any private schools?”
not everything in the world is conspiracy.
How does one ‘learn AI’?
Properly prompting an LLM is not something most people inherently get.
I haven’t used an LLM, but it’s probably similar to how people could not Google for shit. I always considered myself something of an expert at using search engines, although they’ve gone to shit obviously, and with the advent of AI it seems like they will fade out.
I haven’t used an LLM
Amish?
“Properly prompting” is to not prompt. A chat interface is the lowest fidelity interface to use with an LLM.
Tell me more? It’s the only way I’m familiar with interacting with an LLM
Examples to consider:
A code base with TODOs embedded will make fewer mistakes and spend less tokens than if you attempt to direct the LLM only with prompting.
A file system gives an LLM more context than a flat file (or large prompt) with the same contents because a file system has a tree like structure and makes it less likely the LLM will ingest context it doesn’t need and confuse it
Lastly consider the efficacy of providing it tools vs using agent skills which is another form of prompting. Giving an LLM a deterministic feedback loop beats tweaking your prompts every time
Ok so i think i do all of these things and would just describe them as “other ways to prompt and LLM” - i think the nuance youre shooting for here is that using these methods you are “pre-preparing” the prompt - not thinking about it at prompt-time and thus likely to miss stuff.
e.g. Feeding a TODO is just the same as copy-pasting that todo in as a prompt.
Have I understood you correctly?
No, it’s not the same as copying and pasting the TODO into a prompt. Embedding the TODO in code instead of the prompt reduces tokens burned and increases accuracy because it’s observing the TODO in context. Sure you can write more prompting to provide that context, but it still won’t be as accurate. The less context you provide via prompting and instead provide more context through automatic deterministc feedback the better the results
Okay so now I think you’re describing the behaviour I take for granted with the harness i.e. Claude Code.
Having good repo readiness through a good agents/claude.md file + tests + docs means the LLM is able to read more files into its context.
It never occurred to me that anyone would prompt in isolation of their repos but I guess thats exactly what it was like for me last year when I was just feeding ChatGPT prompts away from the repo.
Ez pz. “Interpret this prompt in the proper manner”
That’s almost correct, actually. One of the best things to do is to prompt it to ask you clarifying questions.
Ever see someone using Google and cringe? People who have experience getting AI to do what they want feel the same when they see normies writing their prompts.
oh give me a fucking break
“Normies”
Lol ok
Person who sold NFTs is serious about AI. Next it will be quantum
She can go first then if that her advice.
Attack the problem not one another.
I understand advocating for women but this is a worker VRs the rich problem. Not a woman, bend so you can get a job problem.
Women tend to dominate care positions, nursing, teaching, and child care. None of them are going to be touched by AI, other than massive head aches caused in teaching kids to lazy to learn. Outside of those, women are in no different position than men when facing automation.
Who’s paying her to say this?
