The Commodore Callback 8020 flip phone looks like it’s from decades ago but its price was definitely a sign of today’s times. That’s changed, with Commodore’s announcement today that it will drop the price $100 for most models before pre-orders start next week.

The phone caused a stir when it was announced a week ago. First, there was the thrill of 80s computing legend Commodore making a phone. Then the phone being retro in both look and function caught attention, with a flip-phone form factor combined with a focus on privacy. But one of the most unique features of the Callback 8020 is that it runs Android apps on Linux-based Sailfish OS instead of Android. Among all of the praise though, was criticism that a $500 starting price for the basic models was too high.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is comical.

    Commodore said that three factors were the primary cause of what consumers felt was a high price for the phone. At the top of the list is the one plaguing the entire industry: RAM pricing.

    How much RAM could a phone like this use, anyway?

    Also, saying that they “listened” is bullshit. They just got worried they were priced too high so it wouldn’t sell. So they lowered it. If they listened they wouldn’t have it locked in with WhatsApp, a Meta/Facebook product as the only IM option other than SMS.

  • CallMeAl (like Alan)@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think the problem is that they grossly over estimated how many people actually wanted to buy a “legit” Commodore branded Commodore Ultimate when they came up with the idea to buy the Commodore brand.

    Now they are trying to come up with ways to make it profitable but they don’t really seem to understand Product Market Fit.

    I think it would be a better idea to do some high quality branded merch.

  • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    It really upsets me that block web browser apps… WTF.

    So not we have to get apps that get all types of information from the device instead. Huge NO for me.

  • BeUnique@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t get it. You literally have the choice of any dumb-phone out there, why buy a new one?

    • zglorbz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Many places are phasing out 3G and even 2G networks which would make the vast majority of pre-smartphone phones unusable. Also, proprietary (but technically replaceable) batteries which don’t hold quite the charge they did 15+ years ago.

    • abc@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Point me towards a dumb phone that can run Signal properly and I’ll cancel my 8020 order right now.

      (yes, it’s still a bit of a guess whether the 8020 can actually run it properly, but that’s what they’re promising right now anyway)

  • Pokexpert30 🌓@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Really interesting, the blocking apps is mindful but I’d prefer if I could bypass it explicitly. For instance I extensively use discord for messaging, and I’d need to have it. No rcs is also annoying but I’d make do with signal.