• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    This is generally great news, but even better news would be if it had like 12 users after launching.

    Show Tim Shittey that everyone hates him.

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’s kinda sad. I felt the maintainers feeling of being overwhelmed and underappreciated, but that whole discussion in the issue and the later statement to just hide AI use was such a phenomenal PR debacle he’ll probably never get rid of.

      Lutris was pretty good…

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Lutris was pretty good…

        Undoubtedly, the lutris scripts really made it a great community driven project.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      What is wrong with it? Never had any problems running games on Lutris and it doesn’t require steam (DRM) which is pretty nice.

        • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Has that caused problems? I don’t really care if they are just using AI. If they are breaking things because of it and not validating anything then that is a larger concern.

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            Even if it runs fine there are still problems

            • Slop code can’t be licensed, the license Lutris had is invalid. That means you can’t even fork it unless you can identify the point slop started and fork prior to that.
            • There’s no guarantee the developer who uses slop code even knows what it’s doing. Github is full of nonsense like that now.
  • obnomus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Nice, but Heroic is just way too superior.

    Still want to see it. I hope they implement the proton and don’t just show the games which are native Linux, otherwise it’ll be terrible.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I get that Sweeny doesn’t like to gargle Gabe’s billionaire balls as much as a lot of the users here, but Epic officially supporting Linux is a good thing.

  • Blue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Linux versions of Epic games store and GOG galaxy is still a big win for everyone

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Not just because it enables more access for everyone, but because it represents a deepening commitment by these companies to Linux as a gaming platform.

      The more companies see Linux as a viable gaming platform, the more consumers will. It’s a virtuous cycle, and one that will only help to erode Windows grip on the desktop OS space.

      • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        It’s wild that Sweeney would let this happen. He’s been pretty vocally anti-linux in the past. Must be a big enough change to make him consider Linux dollars worth chasing.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Consider considering that it has worked very well on macOS for years, it can’t be that much of a leap to get it working on Linux.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Installing and running programs is wildly more complicated on Linux than macOS. On macOS there is only one way to do it: a self contained .app bundle. On Linux there are….several incompatible standards. And if you do it a different way than a specific Linux user’s preference, they will loudly complain and tell you that you’re doing it wrong. Even if it works.

          • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            They’ll probably do it similar to what steam does. Steam has learnt a lot there over the years. It’s definitely a pro if it can be easily repackaged, paths configured and they follow the desktop standards, but it will also work without. People will certainly complain if they have to fix stuff themselves

          • eurodyne@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Installing and running programs is wildly more complicated on Linux than macOS

            noooot really, and you’re already coming in with a full head of steam.

            This is only really true in the strict context of “what can happen in 2026”, and not in the context of if “ what has been historically accomplished up to today, 2026”

            The difference? Pretty much 98% if POSIX apps (including the vast amount of pre-steam gaming, and a lot of current steam games), so don’t let this bitter bitch try to convince you otherwise.

            @ayyy, you can complain all you like about how you don’t understand how macOS works or how it is similar and to LINUX and UNIX, but do it somewhere else that doesn’t waste the rest of our time. The rest of us are trying to come together to solve a problem. It’s clear that your only interest is in driving everyone apart, and that doesn’t solve problems. It just creates them.

            And no one here is interested in that bullshit