• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    236
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All his fanboys should be absolutely shitting bricks about this since Elon has been out there for years saying that people who purchase Tesla vehicles absolutely own them. He’s been spouting this bullshit since they got caught remotely crippling software features YEARS ago, but this is further proof Tesla owners are completely at the whim of a tyrannical douchebag who decides if you get the privilege of using something you paid for the way you want.

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      His fanboys are mostly reich-wingers nowadays, and they’re completely impervious to reality-based arguments

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      you don’t even own all the bits you do buy. you pay extra to unlock them. preinstalled, extra-cost dlc.

    • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They won’t. His fanboys will find an excuse for his shitty behavior like they always do.

      It’s like hoping flat earthers would suddenly come to their senses once they see the evidence. They won’t. They would find some other shitty excuse for their stupid belief.

      Edit: stupid autocorrect. lol.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do believe that flat feathers exists somewhere on this pale blue dot / sphere of a world. But methinks you accidentally added an “f” to eathers and don’t mean to talk about feathers.

      • ripcord@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would guess that 80-90% of owners are ignorant (some willfully), or try to separate the man from the company, and not just unrepentant fanboys/girls

        But yeah, agree on the fanboy thing. SpaceX too (which personally I find extra unfortunate since they’ve done some REALLY good things in the LEO launch market and space stuff in general).

        • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wonder how much of SpaceX’s success has happened not because of Musk, but despite him

          • ripcord@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not even remotely a fan of the guy at this point, but from everything I’ve read, a lot of it was actually because of him.

            Tesla too.

            But also a lot of the negative parts of those companies, and failures. And at the Boring Company. And TwitX, etc.

            Whatever contributions he’s made are rapidly evaporating, though. He had plenty of problems 1015 years ago, but the last 5 have been a massive, rapid slide in his contributions, reputation, etc.

            • highenergyphysics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah yes that must be why SpaceX employs multiple professional handlers whose responsibility it is to distract manchild Mosk with shiny bits whenever he gets close to making an actual decision

              • ripcord@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Even if true, someone can both be a piece of work and successful.

                Like how a guy can be a complete moron piece of shit AND a top neurosurgeon.

                Also that person can be a steadily worse neurosurgeon and become more and more just a moron piece of shit.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine buying a $50k car and they take away features because the CEO is having a temper tantrum and wants everyone else to suffer.

    You’d have to be a fool to give this guy your money.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only it was just money.

      There are people joining waiting lists to let Musk put microchips in their brains.

  • KiloGex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can you imagine spending all that money on a car and expecting certain features, only for them to change based on the whims of a manchild who gets his feelings hurt?

  • indigomirage@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since Twitter has nothing to do with Tesla (beyond the emotionally stunted owner) this is serious line being crossed. I mean - I don’t care about Tesla. But I do care about SpaceX and Starlink as they have serious geopolitical implications.

    Some country’s leader disses Twitter and they don’t get to launch satellites. Or their people don’t get satellite internet.

    This amount of power should not be in the hands of one rich guy with an inferiority complex.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      SpaceX and starlink are dead in the water and utterly useless until Musk has them taken away. As long as he’s running those, they’re just shitty companies with lots of empty promises

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Citing fire hazard, Disney bans Tesla vehicles from their properties, worldwide.” would be a hilarious headline.

    • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would at least have some data to back it up. This is just a man-child throwing a hissy fit because the free market decided it didn’t want to do business with Twitter.

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, Disney is run by adults, so I suspect they’re sitting over there watching Elon punch himself in the balls and laughing about it.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, Musk. You really wanna join the ranks with DeSantis?

    You can not out lawyer the mouse.

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      He and DeSantis are already buddy buddy, DeSantis always seems to make sure to protect Musk’s interests whenever there’s some law change that effects Tesla/SpaceX.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shit, Florida has already put provisions in place to protect SpaceX incase they accidentally kill someone.

  • AlexJD@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    10 years ago if someone had told me that in the future the tantrums of a billionaire petulant manchild would decide what features are available in your already paid for car I wouldn’t have believed them.

    • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the other hand, 10 years ago there’s almost no chance you would think that the Disnet Chanel would be a feature in an automobile.

      • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bro 10 years ago was 2013

        I was watching movies on a LG Optimus Link android smartphone in 2011

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t have not believed it, but I would be bummed to learn that we still haven’t made contact with three-tiddied aliens.

  • rynzcycle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    CEO of public company actively makes product worse because of business dealings at a seperate private company owned by said CEO. Not that Tesla shareholders don’t already have enough reason to be pissed, but good lord.

    And it’s not a “feud” that would imply Disney is being petty instead of making the fucking obvious business decision to pull advertising spend from the dumpster fire of racism and controversy that is Twitter.

  • olosta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bob, you know what you have to do. Remove him from Iron Man, that’s petty, useless and perfect.

    • Jarmer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      OMG that’d be hilarious. Also don’t even say a word to anyone, just have an editor trim that 3 second scene from IM2 and replace it on the disney+ streaming service with this new version.

  • yOya@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a pathetic gesture. I’ll show them, I’ll take away features from my cars! No one subs to Disney+ just because they can watch it in their car. All you’re doing is pissing off tesla owners and scaring away potential owners with your little bitch fit. Pathetic.

    • Chriswild@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gotta love having a subscription for your car to give you a worse service than before because a man child bought a social media site.

  • Gemini24601@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    As another once said, “Elon Musk is a stupid man’s genius,” and after all of his tantrums, I see it as true.

  • snowdrop@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t know why the hell you’d need a streaming service in your car anyways

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone who uses it a lot: you don’t need it. But it is nice when you’re waiting for someone, which I do a lot of because sigh I’m basically a soccer mom now. (Kids don’t play soccer and I don’t drive a minivan but…yeah, the comparison is sadly apt.) These days, my kids use it more than I do, since a few times a week they are stuck with me waiting for the other sibling to get out of their activity. Can all this be solved by just handing them my phone instead? Sure.

      As of yesterday, pretty sure my Disney+ app was still there, maybe because we’ve used it before, per the article. My daughter would be upset if it disappeared, but if it does I’ll just bring a iPad and hotspot it. Whatever. Maybe I should be more upset about this but I’m kind of resigned to Musk being an asshole man-child and honestly kind of depressed about being linked to him even if I’ve had the car for years and generally love it.

    • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess you don’t become the manufacturer of the brand with the most auto collisions without putting a big screen on the dash and offering a dozen streaming services.

      Though I suspect there’s a correlation between being stupid / selfish / lazy / unpredictable and owning a Tesla.

      • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh geez, I want to give you an upvote for the first half and a downvote for the second.

        It’s a whiplash experience to move so quickly between fair-minded discussion and needless arrogant bigotry.

        • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This entire thread has been rampant generalisations and shitting on an entire group of people for owning a product. Real Reddit energy which I ignorantly thought we’d be better about.

          Yeah, Elon sucks, but all of a sudden that must mean Tesla owners are Nazis? Come on, what a load of bullshit.

        • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you want to call me bigoted against Tesla owners I will laugh at you and wear that badge.

          I think a person that buys a car from a cryptofaciest’s company, known for their labor rights suppressions, poor build quality, poor design quality, poor resale value, and poor maintenance options, Is a dumbass.

          • dragontamer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            As we all know, Dr. Martin Luther King’s speech…

            I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin the politicians they choose to support, the billionaires they give their money to, and the decisions they make, but instead by…

            Wait wut? Judging people for being shitheads is allowed?

            • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Bigotry: Obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction, in particular prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group

              • dragontamer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Being a bigot against Nazis is a-okay in my book.

                Judging people for what they have done and what they believe in is 100% fine and compatible with Dr. martin Luther King.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s be honest, Tesla is the new BMW, the brand associated with self-important upper-middle-class management pricks.

          “BMW always stops with a jerk” has been a joke since before Tesla existed, and now Tesla has inherited the throne.