Yeah, because everyone is asking for that. They will force ads into everything they can, because Google is an Ad company.

  • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you have a CCwGTV, you should be using Apps Only mode. Sucks that Google hides this, because I’ve found that this is the best streaming device for my needs, but they just keep pushing ads like this. Makes me want to do a homebrew chromecast device.

    But switching to Apps Only mode is a decent workaround… for now. https://support.google.com/googletv/answer/10070784?hl=en

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Will this really remove the ads? From your link:

      In Apps only mode, you don’t get personalized recommendations on your home screen. You’ll find a list of installed apps that you can open to find something to watch. You’ll also find sponsored content and teasers for popular movies and shows.

      • Martin@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, It turns the home screen to a grid of app icons and nothing more.

      • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s still a single banner at the top, but it’s not a giant scroll of ads, and you only have to click down once to get to the apps, instead of scrolling past a whole page of “suggestions”

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yes, but you can’t change the default launcher in the settings. You have to configure the custom launcher to automatically launch everytime, which does require a some adb commands, if I recall correctly.

        Otherwise, setting it to apps mode is the only alternative. Aside from disabling ads, it does disable a few other useful features, but the trade-off is worth it.

        But honestly, now that AppleTV allows VPNs and proxy apps, I’ve mostly stopped using my Google TV boxes.

    • __init__@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s a shame that this turns off the ability to use the google photos screensaver too, to the point it’s a deal breaker for us.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    Google and Roku primarily make money from ads.

    Apple does some stuff that isn’t great, but the Apple TV doesn’t have ads like their competitors. Apps can advertise what’s inside of them when they’re selected, but that’s it on the Home Screen.

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ya, so… They didn’t GIVE me the Google TV device, I had to buy it. Therefore they got their money from me for that hardware. I’m not using other ‘free’ google products that cost them money on that device so why would they be showing ads? What cost are the recouping?

      For the record, I have not seen this and we do have a number of google TV’s in our house. However our primary TV uses an Nvidia Shield.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m a product designer who has worked on a lot of products that have been monetized with ads.

        It’s pretty common for a company to split their revenue targets between register sales and monetization deals. You break even on the hardware, and make profit on the ads.

        • dmtalon@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I sure would like the option to pay for the HW/profits up front and not have perpetual ads.

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Agreed, this tends to be why I keep going back the Apple. It’s performant, will be supported for a decade, and can be configured as a minimally annoying app launcher.

            Biggest problem is that a lot of the setup and security stuff isn’t as nice if it’s not paired to an iPhone.

            • dmtalon@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ya I’m an android user but my wife/kid use iPhones and I actually have a MacBook. I hate iPhones, and don’t love apple but I do really like my mbp :)

              • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yeah, we’re also a “blended family” with regards to platforms. Some of the stuff in my house is in Google’s ecosystem, some is in Apple’s, and I have a Pi in the house that plays mediator between the platforms.

                I have a box of chrome cast devices in many different flavors. I mostly only use them for traveling. Home media I keep on the bulkier AppleTVs.

                • dmtalon@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Oh, we’re all in google here (because of me) except the two outcasts (even though I’m outnumbered)

                  We have 6, and about to have 12 chromecast audios that run speakers all through the house. All tv’s have google TV dongles except the main tv that has Shield TV (still android) Google mini’s in every room

                  You say “Pi” to mediate? What do you mean there? (Raspberry pi?). I run Pihole in our house for ads,trackers etc.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Fun fact: Amazon actually have you this option with the original Kindle. They sold two different versions where the only difference was that the cheaper one would show ads.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Typically they’d be recouping the cost of the tv they sold at a loss. They sell it at a loss because they know they’ll make more money in the long run via the ads.

        • dmtalon@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          In this case, these are not TV’s but small HDMI plug in devices. $30 device that I’d be surprised if they’re selling at a loss https://store.google.com/us/product/chromecast_google_tv

          And personally, If they are doing that, I want two versions, one I can pay the actual cost w/some profit for them, and no ads. The ads keep making them money long after they recoup any hw costs as they continue to profit off users. When I bought an amazon Kindle way back when, I chose the one without ads for the same reason. I’m ok paying for a product vs. being the product.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I worked on the original Chromecast and I was told the price point at launch was specifically set at the break even point.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s fairly easy to block Roku ads with a Pihole. I’ve got all mine in a special group and all I see is a nice, empty space where the ad should be.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        True. Just saying there is a reason why Google and Roku’s stuff is dirt cheap. The real money is in the ads and selling your data.

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Agreed. Although even if you’re blocking the loading of ads, they’re still capturing and selling behavioral data. Also, I have remotes that advertise video services that don’t even exist anymore.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I don’t know about Roku but Google doesn’t sell data, just ads. You can’t go to Google and buy data about users.

    • bbigras@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      I understand putting ads on a free service like Google search or YouTube. But I bought this fucking Chromecast. I even suggested it to friends and family.

      Another case that pisses me off is having bought a pixel watch at premium price and they want me to pay a monthly shitty Fitbit subscription to provide me with some trivial computations.

      Same thing with their Google home screen. You pay a good price and you need a subscription to use the fucking sleep sensor that you paid for.

      Another one is having a premium pixel pro and they still want me to buy a Google one subscription to get useless photos filters with Google photos.

      I love that Android is open source (mainly) but fuck you Google you are an embarrassment to your former self.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        There is a reason why these things are under $50, and the boxes without ads cost 3x more. This is always Google’s playbook. Start with limited ads on a free or cheap service, then open things up to a monetization team to milk it.

        • bbigras@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Tbh I don’t know if they would cost 3x as much without ads. The hardware is kinda shit. It’s slow are barely working.

          Start with limited ads on a free or cheap service, then open things up to a monetization team milk it.

          Yeah that is probably they plan all along to lock us in and then enshitify it as time go on but even if they sell them at loss, we consume a lot of YouTube (I even rent movies from Google). They can make their money without ads, if they actually cared about having a great product and not just milk us.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s how they started. Small, tasteful, text only ads. It’s how they got all their market share. Everyone loved them because at the time the internet was a nightmare of pop up ads, toolbars, and seizure inducing flashing boxes.

          It’s like when the big box stores come in with lower prices to drive smaller shops out of business then jack up their prices once they’re the only game in the area. It happens less now because they used those tactics years ago to push out Main Street, but you can still see it from time to time.

      • krimson@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Checkout Projectivy or any other 3rd party launcher on the app store. I installed it on a chromecast and an Nvidia Shield the moment they started showing ads.

        Also won’t be buying these anymore in the future. Rather setup a Raspberry Pi and use that.

        • bbigras@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah I already use Projectivy. It’s pretty nice. Thanks.

          I’ll also check other alternatives. I hope there is way to use the Chromecast protocol with Foss servers.

  • cbarrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    God damn it Google.

    When I turn on the TV, it’s fine if the masthead is a banner advertising a new show. I’m literally using the product to find things to watch.

    But fast food? That can fuck right off.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve had an Nvidia Shield since they came out, about 6 months ago when I started seeing a car ad I was like “it’s time to switch to something else…”

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I have yet to find one that isn’t lacking basic features like being about to put the device to sleep.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What did you switch to?

        My shield has always been laggy… I’d like to find a TV “OS” that can run apps and is actually fast.

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The Zidoo Z9X Pro, it’s about the same price and supports Dolby Vision and Atmos in Kodi (they have their own build called ZDMC) and is generally faster then the Shield (USB 3, SATA, 4 GB RAM, etc… ).

          It doesn’t seem to support the DRM protected streaming apps that use Widevine though (Netflix and the like) since I can’t find them in the Google Play Store, which sucks, but I can just use the smart apps on my LG TV for that.

          It seems that it’s really difficult to find a STB that supports everything these days and doesn’t come with shitty specs/is years old 😑

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I guess it needs to be said again: “smart TVs” are cheap because of post-purchase monetization. That is: they gather your viewing and UI interaction behaviors (and, in some cases, ambient sound) for analysis and sale by the manufacturer.

    The TV is a product, sure, but so are you when you use a “smart TV” like that without mitigating its connectivity by not letting it on your network and just using a discrete streaming peripheral of some sort instead.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Signage TVs are basically as cheap but without the slow as balls UI filled to the brim with ads.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Dude, do you remember how expensive a 65” 4k TV was when the technology debuted? Paying $1000 nowadays for what’s basically cutting-edge display tech is nothing - they were in the neighborhood of $10k or more when they were first produced. And you can get one with older tech from TCL or whatever for like $3-400 now, which is embarrassingly cheap for a 65” 4k.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          A lot of technology is expensive when it’s first introduced and it has not reached mass market yet. Bigger TVs were already gaining popularity before Smart TVs. Getting cutting-edge display tech from a couple decades ago ain’t all that.

          Nah, this stuff is not nearly cheap enough to justify all the spyware and ads.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Pre-purchase is monetized as well. Those streaming services that are featured on the box, and on the remote featured on the box, those are also paid placements.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is ridiculous. I would understand if this is subsidized devices where you pay less in exchange for having ads. You already bought the device and suddenly it got shittier. Might as well get a free, big brotherly tv with ads from Telly.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It always has been a device that is primary subsidized by ads and selling your behavioral data.

      There is a reason why an Nvidia Shield or AppleTV costs a lot more. They’re making more from the price at the register than the ads and data sales.

      • Dempf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah but Google started putting these home screen ads on Nvidia shield also.

        Not super up to date with that though because the second they did I switched to a custom launcher.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        People in this thread said their Nvidia shield has ads too now. I guess costing a lot more doesn’t guarantee the device won’t be updated in the future to include ads.

        As for apple tv, is it usable in a household that’s primarily use Android? Can you cast stuff from Android apps to it? Or is it only supports airplay from apple devices?

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nvidia didn’t push the ads. Nvidia got their pound. Google is pushing the ads onto the shield.

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            So, the price of the hardware is not an indication whether the device will have ads or not later down the line? Even if you spent your money on the top of the line models it’ll eventually got ads if it’s running Google TV OS?

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Correct. GoogleTV is completely owned by Google. Nvidia has no say in what google pushes to the platform. If you don’t want Ads… stay away from google/android TV.

              I own 3 shields (pre-ad-gate purchases). I was a huge advocate for it. It was a great device that did everything I wanted a tv console to do. I would not buy a new one. And will not buy a shield 2 if it has the same OS on it.

              The best you can do is stop the upgrades… or use a custom launcher. But the OS itself is going to find a way to get ads because that’s what google programmed it to do.

              It’s actually in Google’s best interest to do this anyway. Nvidia likely didn’t pay google anything to have the OS on the device. This is google’s way of extracting money out of you in this process.

      • Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Same for cheap TVs these days btw, their home page ads are why they’re able to sell you a decent quality 85" TV for under $2k.

        On the Nvidia shield side, they’ve started adding more and more ads lately, which is completely unexcusable. Thankfully it’s not hard to use alternative launchers.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I almost completely stopped going to the movies once the pre-roll stuff was ads for cars, food, etc instead of just movie trailers.

    The more inconvenient Google makes avoiding ads on their platforms and services, the less of Googles platforms and services I will use.

    For now I have a third party launcher setup on my CCwGTV in my living room, but the Apple TV 4k I have in my bedroom sure is looking nice these days with how well it performs and how much less trouble it is to setup and reset should I need/want to do that.

    Going the HTPC route is less desirable to me since services like Amazon and Netflix go out of their way to restrict resolutions offered to things like a Debian box running Firefox. I could use Windows and Edge, but that would mean hitching myself to another company that seems more interested in selling me to advertisers than selling things to me.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      My MCPC is a micro PC that’s at least 10 years old. It plays h.265 at 2k just fine. I’m excited to see things move back to media computers.