• kellenoffdagrid❓️@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah but it’s not that accurate, and it leaves most normal mobile users out of the picture. I know YouTube knew exactly what they were doing when they removed dislikes, but it still seems absolutely insane to remove such a useful tool for sifting through the bullshit.

    • timmymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was removed because Biden got too many downvotes. It’ll be back soon. It was stupid of them to take it away.

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s not why it was removed

        It was removed not long after one of their Rewind vids was disliked to hell.

        And it ain’t coming back, at least they haven’t so much as hinted at it

        • timmymac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nah, that’s what they told you and you believed. Don’t be a fool for the media. It’s a bad look.

            • timmymac@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              5 months ago

              I talk truth in my own thoghts. You speak lies in talking points you were told to say. And you do. Be smarter. Don’t follow the herd.

              • WamGams@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                I am glad to see that in his personal bankruptcy, Alex Jones has decided to spend the free time here on Lemmy…

                Welcome to have you, Ale, I can’t wait to hear more about the chicken fried steak that God talked to you through.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            Whoa this guy’s badass.

            He knows what’s really going on, and it just happens to always be opposite of whatever “the media” says.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    So now we have to read a community note to know a video is garbage instead of just seeing a massive dislike bar and clicking off?

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        5 months ago

        The removed the dislike count a couple years ago, so you can no longer see if a video is terrible.

          • Moneo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Works surprisingly well even after all this time. I often forget its been removed.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              It isn’t a real count of users who have clicked the dislike button, YouTube no longer makes that data available.

              So I would not put much stock in that number.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s not real though, you do know that right? There isn’t some hidden dislike count that YT has that the extension can access.

            I imagine it’s taken from other users of the extension clicking the dislike button. A biased and wildly uneven sample. I would not put much stock in it at all.

        • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          The thumbnail and title alone is typically enough to know how garbage it is.

      • Alk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        The dislike bar was real, I’ll tell ya, I’ve lived nigh on eighty years and me own two eyes seent the dislike bar clear as day! Ye better believe, sonny, it’s the truth!

      • Retiring@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t see what was wrong with the comment of /u/voyajer. Can you elaborate?

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah, the dislike bar used to be a thing. You could see how many dislikes there were compared to likes, all represented on a line below the two buttons. It was sort of like this image, except imagine the “yes” and “no” as a single line (but retaining their separate colors).

        • expatriado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          which is unfortunate, i think YT does it to save paid labor on moderating comments, but this allows video posters to upload misleading info and delete correcting replies, which also pairs well with hidden thumbs down

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It also allows uploaders to stop hate filled posting, like incels trashing the comments on anything positive about female characters in media.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              5 months ago

              It also allows uploaders to stoke hate with their videos and delete reasonable takes and people calling out misinformation in the comments.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              Honestly, I’d rather the channel have the first say here. It would be even better if some independent mod team could override channel owners though if there are enough reports.

              • snooggums@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                5 months ago

                Enough reports is how brigades are effective.

                There isn’t a great solution that solves all the possibilities, it is a difficult problem. An independent mod team sounds great until you get into the details of how they are formed and the fact that they are people too who might miss nuance or hold their own shitty opinions.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Sure, but a manual review is way better than any form of automated system. To combat brigading, the mod team could issue temporary suspensions if that’s deemed to be the case, and full bans if the behavior is repeated.

                  It would be quite expensive for YouTube to do that, so it’s not happening. Best we’re getting is some automated nonsense, probably based on AI.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        And Youtube will 100% allow creators to hide notes, as well. Corporations will not allow themselves to be criticized on their own pages.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I value my mental health too much to regularly dive into the YouTube comment section

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I must be watching different videos than the people complaining about YouTube comments. The ones I see are virtually all positive.

        • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Don’t just look at the comments. Look at the replies to the top comments. 8 out of 10 times they turn super toxic super quickly in my experience.

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    another chance to provide free labour to train their AI!

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah clearly training data does get much review for these peasant facing products. I am assuming real tool will take legions of pros to properly tune up.

        The issue not LLM per we, the issue is that none of these clown companies appear to do Amy data quality control. They just rush whatever janky thing they got to drive headlines.

    • invalid_display_name@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      Damn I miss those. Nowadays it’s really hard to find a video that’s in another language and has subtitles. The only subtitles you will find are the automatically-generated ones, which suck

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’re at least understandable (usually), but they’re like 5-10 seconds behind the video (sometimes longer), and they can be difficult to interpret at times.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          They’re only about 90% accurate and usually that’s better than nothing, but sometimes the little bit that’s wrong is very confusing

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This sounds like a great spot for scammers to flood for maximum visabilty. It’ll be too much effort to moderate, so creators will just disable them (if they can) or this will be shut down in about (checks YouTube’s history of dealling with scammers) 3.5 years.

  • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, if this is basically Twitter’s Community Notes feature, but for YouTube, I’m all for it. Bit of a balancing act, but it’s the last thing that hasn’t been completely wrecked now that Twitter became Xitter.

  • SouthFresh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    I give this about two weeks before they realize that it’s as effective at helping their advertising as having dislike buttons are.

    I am not condoning poisoning of this well of information, but I will laugh my ass off when it inevitably occurs.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      It really is unfortunate as it COULD be a really good feature if it were being implemented by someone who wasn’t just trying to crowdsource AI training data that will go into commercial products without compensation to anyone. It could be a great tool for professionals and experts to expand on what creators say, a way to call out falsehoods and Hypocrites, and a way to find your people in a world that is growing ever bleaker. But no, it is just being done to force more ads down our throats and harvest more money from us.

    • FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I condone poisoning this feature with false info. maybe it will teach them that the dislikes should be public again. using an extension is cool and all, but so many people still don’t know about it.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      And, once they discontinue it, I hope someone creates an add-on to bring it back like they did with dislikes.

      It’s a bit out-of-scope, but it’d be a great SponsorBlock feature!

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    lol, considering the “quality” content in the comments section it’s just going to be a continuation of that dumpster fire.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would never go as far as to say that they’re “quality,” but I do think YT comment sections aren’t the complete shitshow that they were a decade or so ago. It really does depend on the channel though too.