• JaymesRS@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    As long as the fediverse has a barrier to entry for most people of mandating choosing a server first, it will never become the mainstream choice.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hey… that just gave me a small idea… what if we made a “flock” or “herd” of Mastodon servers? The group of servers would all federate with each other, have the same block and allow lists, moderation policy and teams spread throughout them.

      When you make an account you can be assigned a random instance name within the flock. If your instance goes down you could still possibly log in using other servers? Main benefit would be spreading server costs and maintenance effort and de-centralized operating, but still keep a centralized feel to it?

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Honestly that’s probably the best sort of solution. A group that has some minimum standards of moderation and maintenance/upgrade management plan and just evenly distribute the load as people arrive.

        Then as a second phase make it easy to transfer, that way at the point the user gets comfortable they can easily swap to a better* “home” for those that care, for those that don’t, make the server choice be virtually invisible.

      • Gregor@gregtech.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        If they have the same people running all of them, how is that different from running a single mastodon server in kubernetes, so that it doesn’t get overloaded?

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’d have different domain names to get people used to the concept. John Doe would sign up, and become john.doe@apple.server.hostname, Jane Doe would sign up and become jane.doe@banana.server.hostname

          • Gregor@gregtech.eu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            This is quite unnecessary, it would be simpler if we have a list of the long-running and most stable instances and have the users pick one.

            • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              That is what we have now, but clearly people are averse to making a choice that they are not technically inclined to know how big or small the consequences of that are. My solution is a spitball one with obvious flaws, but essentially it is that the instance is picked randomly out of a group of very closely, if not identically aligned servers.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, things requiring choosing a instance like, say, email, are doomed to fail

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m guessing you meant this sarcastically, but you may have been right for the wrong reasons. Look at this graph, by the metric of the way the fediverse works that is a failure. Apple and Google are massively dominant because people don’t want to think about it and most just go with their phone os maker who makes them create one when setting it up, and there is no fediverse server equivalent to that.

        a graph of email users by domain. apple and gmail dominate.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 month ago

          This looks like it’s conflating service providers and clients. Thunderbird doesn’t provide email accounts to the public as far as I know.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Nevertheless email stays the defacto standard for business communication and has stayed intercompatible with a wide range of clients, servers and plugins. So this graph could be better but is apparently not a big issue as long as companies and unis keep running their own servers, forcing big tech to stay with the standards.

          • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            That works when the decentralized protocol is the 800 lb gorilla first. You can’t get there with the fediverse in this internet era, sadly.

            Email also doesn’t have a moderation factor that requires emotional work.

            • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              The matrix protocol is a good example to prove you wrong. It has been popularized in the past 5-6 years (i.e. this era of the internet) it has well over 100 million users and growing, is being used in hundreds of universities and wont stop growing, is being used by government bodies all over the world and has unified most of the software dev landscape into one protocol. Its hard fucking work and you have to start with exactly those groups which are easier to convince and then you can move on to the average consumer. Thats how email did it and thats how matrix will do it.

          • hobovision@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m pretty sure “apple mail” refers to the Mail app on iPhones and Macs, not the email address. There’s probably tons of people using Gmail addresses with the Apple Mail app.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          So you are saying Mastodon won’t take off because people need to choose a server but also because having a “default” where majority will ptobably end up is bad - but this is literally the solution to the problem you mentioned

          • med@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s the solution on the user experience side, but not the backend/server side. For both infrastructure and idealogical reasons. These two things don’t have to be the same.

            Disney parks wants park visitors to feel like their exploring, but design in such a way that thepy don’t actually stray that far from the preferred paths. Also they have clear sign posting.

            There’s no reason the fediverse can’t design the opposite. Helping users into feeling like there’s a set path, and that they’re doing the right thing, while subtly encouraging exploration.

            It’s just the opposite of where all talent and techniques of internet software design are right now, so it’s going to take some work.

            Edit: Most people don’t jump into a hedge to get off the main road, they find a small, unplanned trail or desire path, then learn to navigate the jungle when that path ends.

          • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Nobody really actively chooses Apple Mail.

            It’s just that they buy iPhones, and they want a total no-brainer, like, a phone that’s fully set up and ready to use without them having to do anything because it, like, totally confuzzles them 'n stuff. So whichever friendly salesperson sells them their phone also sets everything up for them. Including an e-mail account because they need one for their Apple account, but they don’t know if they’ve got one.

            If they buy an Android phone, it’s the same, only that they get a Gmail account if they don’t happen to already have one.

        • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Still, this chart looks like it’s actually counting phone apps rather than providers. Google doesn’t have two separate e-mail services AFAIK.

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean, I hear you (we’re both here after all), but honestly, I think this is a bad take and approach (if getting more users is a goal.

        It’s not the 90s anymore. And even email services are given to you by your employer or selected from the closest big brand provider (Google etc).

        All of which is a far cry from “nerdygardeners.io” administered by some rando anonymous account you’ve never heard of before.

        For mainstream success, the instances thing was dead on arrival. Just was and is. Which is fine, the Fedi can be and arguably should be something else.

        IMO the success of BlueSky is good for the Fedi. It can take the “let’s be the next mainstream thing” monkey off of its back and just be itself.

        • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          IMO the success of BlueSky is good for the Fedi. It can take the “let’s be the next mainstream thing” monkey off of its back and just be itself.

          Plus, it keeps the obnoxious “But muh follower count” fame whores and the majority of the “Why can’t this be exactly like Twitter, I want a total Twitter clone” dumb-dumbs out. They’d ruin Fediverse culture even more than the second migration wave two years ago which was so massive that those who fled back then only encountered each other on Mastodon and hardly anyone who had been in the Fediverse before then.

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        At least in the early days of email before gmail, hotmail, or yahoo, you would get assigned an email from your work, university, or ISP.

        • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Exactly why most Germans only had a @t-online.de address back in the day. The only exceptions were those who needed an e-mail account before they had their own home and their own landline connection.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not really. I mean, sure it’s the same concept, but email has been getting semi-centralized between the big players now, with gmail and maybe icloud getting the largest chunk of users. That would be similar to letting users choose between .world or .ml to sign up with, which is against the fediverse principle to spread the load as wide as possible.

        When you present the lowest common denominator internet user with hundreds of instances to choose from and requiring them to think further than clicking through a sign-up page, you lose user interest pretty quickly.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m actually okay with semi-centralized. Most people need that to trust a platform, but it still gives you the option to self host if you really care.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, most people wants an easy migration. If the interface was nearly identical to Twitter, there’d be a flood.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Misskey has a more similar UI to Twitter, and it can’t even get noticed by fediverse users.

        • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          But hardly anyone in the Fediverse, next to no-one on Mastodon and literally no-one outside the Fediverse knows that Misskey exists. Not outside of Japan anyway. Or any of the Forkeys, for that matter (if you’re a Westerner and neither an otaku nor a weeb, Iceshrimp or Sharkey may suit you better).

          For more Mastodon users than not, the Fediverse = Mastodon. And outside the Fediverse, hardly anyone has even heard of the Fediverse.

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        In what regards what normies would use of the featureset, they are identical tho - pretty much everything is identical these days. Log in, go to your timeline / flood / jeep / whatever, click “post new”, copy-paste a meme, hit toot / blarg / weep / whatever. There. Done.

        99% of people use the exact same 1% of the features of a service.

    • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      So what, should we have a website where you push a button and it sends you to a random instance to sign up?

      • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just imagine the surprise when a new user is placed in hexbear or one of the porn servers.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The idea would be the servers would have shared ban/block lists and similar rules so that they can share the load of having open sign ups.

        Basically a coop of instances to improve on-boarding. If you join the coop then you get added to the pool of instances that get assigned normies at random.

        If the authentication was federated it’d be ideal as well but I assume this would be outside the scope of AP and would cause issues if you tried to post from your mastodon.social account from mastodon.world’s server for instance.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The authentication could be another service, split from Mastodon, Lemmy, Pixelfed, … that only gave that service. The instance asks the auth server about “user@instance: password” and the server just says “OK/fail”. That or sending the user to the auth server to get a session cookie.

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        See my reply to u/Rentlar, but for most users, yes, the easier the onboarding, the more accessible it is; the more people won’t immediately run away because they’re afraid they’ll make the wrong choice.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Or you make it like a traditional website with an API used by people making frontends, but the backend (the database) is decentralized, just like regular websites but instead of having a bunch of servers owned by AWS it’s just a bunch of people providing storage space on their servers.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            What is the incentive for people to host an instance at the moment?

            What is the incentive for people to share files via peer to peer networks?

            What is the incentive for people to host Minecraft servers?

            Need me to go on?

            If in your mind the only incentive that people have to host instances is to have power over it and its users then they’re exactly the kind of people you don’t want to see hosting instances.

            • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              What is the incentive for people to host an instance at the moment?

              I liked the community that had built up and wanted to help that continue.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Well, in a system like I’m talking about, adding your server and storage space in the mix would make the whole thing more reliable and add to the storage capacity so more content can be hosted/backed up, just like paying for a second server to host a website allows to store more stuff and to start creating backups. You would still help build the community (the website), you just wouldn’t have an administrative role outside of the communities you would want to moderate.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      joinmastodon.org (the ‘official’ way to get join mastodon), has a default server for its join button. To me this looks very similar to the default server that appears when you try to create a bluesky account. So… I guess that’s not a barrier after all.

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah, they’ve implemented this a while ago, this year IIRC. People are on old information bashing Mastodon.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Email was invented in 1983.

        It was revolutionary, the utter example of a “killer app” that had people and businesses running out to buy computers just to replace paper memos. You setup your mail server to hook into that brand new, stunning ecosystem of near instant communication from across the world.

        Now there are 6,000,000,000 “killer” apps you can install in seconds from your pocket computer. I can hit “install” and be talking face to face with a stranger in Singapore in 30 seconds, all from easy, low effort walled gardens.

        Federation was and is a reasonable way to host things, but comparing current systems to email is a misnomer. People dealt with federation because they had to. If gmail has existed in 1983, no one would have had their own federated email servers. Hell, AOL tried to choke the internet itself to death and almost succeeded in the early 90s because it was an “all in one” solution. They had aol only webpages and everything, including email. Its a twist of fate that they failed, mainly due to the onset of always on broadband, not because people didn’t want things easy.

        Make things easy, people will use it. They will only do hard if they have to.

    • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just log onto mastodon.social and be done with it. That’s the one that will still be running until the they turn out the lights on the service, I figure. And then go kick in a buck or two a month on Patreon to help defray development and server costs. (Not being the product is worth a donation by itself, I figure.)

    • Ghostface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why can’t mastodon influencers create content on how easy it is to pick a server.

      Ah make it like a food hall and anthropo the servers as food.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, it’s a network of indeoendent websites. I’m not sure what kind of solution to this people want.

      People seem to be able to choose which wrbsite they’re signing up for when looking at Twitter, BlueSky, and Threads. It’s not like it’t that weird of an idea.

      They even grok the idea that different Wordpress-based websites are different from each other!

      Maybe if we stopped treating “Mastodon” as a space, and talked about it like the webhost software it is, people would understand.

    • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It actually doesn’t.

      Install the official Mastodon app on your phone, launch it, scroll past the instance selection box that railroads you to mastodon.social anyway, and it’s no more complicated than Twitter. It’s just that nobody knows that.

      Fun fact: The official Bluesky app has a selection box for a PDS, too. It’s no more and no less complicated than the official Mastodon app. Nobody knows that either.

      Granted, of course, if you let yourself be railroaded, the place where you land in the Fediverse won’t be the bee’s knees, and you won’t know that there are not only better Mastodon instances (or more Mastodon instances in the first place), but also better server applications than Mastodon (or anything else than Mastodon in the Fediverse in the first place). But hey, it’s easy-peasy.

    • madjo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As long as email has a barrier to entry for most people of mandating choosing a server first, it will never become the mainstream choice.

  • timconspicuous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    While I generally avoid politics on this blog, it’s hard to ignore the political biases permeating X and BlueSky. X has veered heavily toward far-right ideologies, while BlueSky is often associated with far-left communities. This polarized landscape doesn’t work for those of us seeking a neutral space for meaningful interactions.

    lol

  • audaxdreik@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    All these “why are people using Bluesky and not Mastodon” topics are starting to give me a headache. You’ve been told and on some level, I have to assume you understand the reasons, but are simply unwilling to address them. When people say, “it’s difficult to use” instead of understanding why they think that way, you just dismissively wave your hands and say, “no it’s not”.

    If you want people to use Mastodon, you need to SHOW people the power of federation while HIDING all the rough bits. People want to go to where the friends, writers, artists, scientists, etc. they want to follow are and sign up for an account there. Simple as. In this way, they very much want at least the appearance of centralization. I don’t want to have to get balls deep in an instance’s politics to understand their moderation, who they’re federated with, if they have the funds to operate into the foreseeable future, and how to migrate my data if any of those things goes sideways.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I remember when I first tried to use Mastodon and struggled with how best to make it work, so I asked what was probably a basic question to the Enlightened™. Instead of being helped, I was met with “it’s easy, maybe you’re just dense?”.

      Then I thought that maybe Mastodon doesn’t have the kind of people I’d want to interact with on it.

      • marx2k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unironically, this makes me pine for the old days where usenet discussions were lively.

        • Two9A@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Mm, reminds me of the old world of IRC. I still remember fondly when I asked for help installing FreeBSD, and got banned with a message of “try linux”.

          So I did, never looked back. (Until I got a Mac at least, which counts as a BSD.)

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve never see anyone respond with hostility to any ‘how to’ question on mastodon. What you’ve described sounds totally unlike anything I’ve seen there. So if you have a link to your discussion, I’d be interested in seeing how that happened.

    • Bilb!@lem.monster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think that if you want BlueSky like growth for activity pub… You federate with Threads. Or another hypothetical flagship where everyone is sent. Stop worrying spreading users around so much. People who join that network on the flagship can learn about federation and instance switching later.

      I’m sure many people on activitypub would prefer that it grows more like it has though.

  • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    im gonna be real, this guy sounds like a loser. he talks about the progressive political lean and the porn as if they’re BAD things

    • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Porn industry is certainly a bad thing though. It is quite hostile to women, and many have been harmed by it and wished they had a good exit.

      Bit I definitely agree that progressive lean is a good thing. Fwiw I didn’t read this article.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        The modern porn industry is much more independent than it used to be. Most creators control and own their content and choose where it gets uploaded initially. In the past, the porn business was absolutely abusive to their stars but I think it’s much less the case these days. Filmmakers have to fight for actors because if they don’t treat them well or pay them their worth, they’ll just post their own content directly to their fans. I’m sure there are still huge negatives but I just don’t think it’s as bad as it once was and I certainly don’t think the porn industry is something to be upset about these days.

        • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Certainly some will say that, and even more would do if your environment is privileged (such as a safe neighborhood in the west or USA). You have to look at aggregate data, not anecdotes.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Those are precisely why I like BlueSky. I don’t know if this was normal for twitter or what, but I learned you can search for a hashtag of your kinks (exp. #bigboobs) and you can see porn from people that have posted pics or posts about it. You can also hide other tags from ever showing up in the results, which lets you finetune what you’re looking for. I know the search works relatively the same as twitter with respect to hashtags, but was porn on twitter this whole time?

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve been on Bluesky since February. I have yet to see any nudity that I didn’t actively seek out. It’s not too difficult.

        • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m on a (streams) instance on which someone else is following pr0n accounts. That instance is small enough (13 channels, including clones of external channels) to suggest them as contacts to me until I’ve removed them as suggestions.

          Only boobs I saw without searching mastodon.social for non-pr0n hashtags.

  • OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s weird to me how obsessed some people are with proving to the world that their social media platform of choice is superior. The Fediverse works, we have content, and anyone who decides to seek out a platform that offers what the Fediverse offers can join. Tell your friends about your experience if they might be interested but if they don’t stick with it you don’t have to be all salty about it.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Agreed. It’s silly.

      I like Mastodon. It’s like social media from 2010, chronological, only seeing what you want, great curation tools, and no ads or stupid algorithm. Moderation is also way better on Mastodon, though it can vary by instance.

      I haven’t used BlueSky, but I imagine it feels pretty familiar, which is what a lot of people want, and that’s cool too.

      They can both be good things.

  • XNX@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Mastodon is lead by a singular developer that uses Ruby for his app that hasnt gotten a new feature in 2+ years and they dont accept pull requests from community members that have been adding features to third party apps that new users never learn exist because they get stufk between learning what a “fediverse instance” is

    Meanwhile Bluesky has features twitter or any other platform dont have yet (custom algorithms, chronological feed with a couple posts from your custom feeds in between some chronological posts, adding custom moderators)

    The protocol that Bluesky used also has a lemmy/reddit alternative too https://frontpage.fyi/ (in beta)

    • unrushed233@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s definitely not beta, it feels more like a very early alpha

      And it looks more like Hacker News or lobste.rs, not Lemmy or Reddit, since it doesn’t allow the creation of threads, only posting URLs?

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The fact that the fediverse has been mentally limited to “Mastodon and Lemmy” is so sad. The features many people complained weren’t on Mastodon were right there on Akkoma, Misskey, Friendica, Hometown, and others. But nobody would even look at them.

      Even on the fediverse nobody wants to discuss the sea of alternative services.

      • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because nobody knows they exist. Especially not on Mastodon. And even less outside the Fediverse, tech media included.

        And truth be told, way too many Mastodon users don’t want to know. They want the Fediverse to remain what they thought it was when they joined: only vanilla Mastodon.

        Really goes to show that Lemmy is full of tech-curious geeks: Tell a Lemmy user about a Fediverse project that’s neither Lemmy nor Mastodon, and it’s much more likely for the reply to be something along the lines of, “where public instances.”

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    rolls eyes

    I thought the whole point of the fediverse was that it doesn’t matter which service you use, just as long as you’re in the pool.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem is partially that bluesky isn’t really the Fediverse. It doesn’t use the standard, and isn’t truly interoperable. Accounts can be bridged, but that’s a hacky workaround, not actual intercompatibility.

      And threads is run by a company whose human rights violations would take a week just to read out loud.

      The idea that the specific platform doesn’t matter isn’t a blanket statement, it’s a description of being interoperable, nothing more. Bluesky isn’t truly interoperable, and threads is run by Meta who facilitated ethnic cleansing, mass rape, and the burning of whole villages in Myanmar despite countless explicit warnings that these things would happen if they didn’t take safety measures (not to mention all the other garbage Meta has done or enabled)

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well…I don’t know why you included Twitter on that list, as they’ve NEVER been part of the fediverse.

        Threads is fully integrated. You can personally block them from your end, but thats all you.

        It would be like saying “Dominos doesn’t make pizza. It has never been a pizza company”. With your logic being that you don’t like their pizza. Doesn’t make it true just because YOU don’t eat the pizza.

        Bluesky I hear conflicting reports on. Some people say it is, because it can be, others say it’s not, because it’s not official. I get both sides on this.

        But the last part…is objectively not true. It happrns to work that way FOR NOW. It just isn’t profitable enough for the major players to sink any real resources into.

        The fact that it’s adfree has more to do with the fact that 60k people on all of Lemmy with most instances having a few hundred people “on” it, and also advertising companies not understanding the concept of federation.

        I could start my own instance, and sell ads to corporate overlords. The biggest problem I’d face is the idea of trying to convince any company with money to spend that money on me putting an ad on for such a small audience.

        If/when the fediverse ever gains momentum and becomes mainstream, you can guarentee that ads will be everywhere.

        Because nobody owns the fediverse. Which means if I sell an ad on my instance, all federated instances will see the ad. Sure, you could defederate from my instance. But what would happen right now if lemmy.world sold ads? Is every instance going to defederate from the biggest instance, with the majority of communities? That would essentially break the fediverse.

        We’re all on a service that you think is immune to centralization, but forgot the core concept that humans like to socially congragate. Which means it’s inevitable that there will always be one big dominant instance. Which means if this thing ever goes mainstream, the ads are coming, and they’ll be on all the big instances.

        • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well…I don’t know why you included Twitter on that list, as they’ve NEVER been part of the fediverse.

          I included it because the article title included it, and I agreed it never would be. I then went farther and said I don’t consider any of those beside Mastodon to be Fediverse because they all are corporations creating platforms for shareholders, NOT users.

          It would be like saying “Dominos doesn’t make pizza. It has never been a pizza company”. With your logic being that you don’t like their pizza. Doesn’t make it true just because YOU don’t eat the pizza.

          To use your analogy, It’s actually more like they have the appearance of a pizza-like substance, but eating it you know it’s not pizza and never will be because it’s made of human waste.

          Because nobody owns the fediverse. Which means if I sell an ad on my instance, all federated instances will see the ad. Sure, you could defederate from my instance. But what would happen right now if lemmy.world sold ads? Is every instance going to defederate from the biggest instance, with the majority of communities? That would essentially break the fediverse.

          If it was pushing ads, absolutely! I believe the majority of us came to the fediverse to escape the ads/corporate enshitification, so the moment this stuff starts creeping in we can all just defederate them. Every admin knowing this would be the outcome I think also helps keep the fediverse “honest” as well.

          • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Idea: The ads could be marked as such by the protocol or the instance would risk detestation. Then, every other instance could choose if they show ads or not.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      People tried to bring more content through bridges. Mastodonians promptly started crying about how it literally puts peoples lifes in danger. Some still have #nobridge tags in their profiles to this day, thinking it matters somehow in an open network.

      • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think in many cases it was never about Bluesky or Jack Dorsey who never really had a saying on Bluesky proper anyway. It was more about keeping the Fediverse ActivityPub-only or even Mastodon-only.

        In that light, I think the only reason why there haven’t been any calls for totally Fediblocking all of Hubzilla is because 75% of the Fediverse have never even heard the name, and maybe a few hundred people outside Hubzilla know how it works and what it does. No critical mass to be appalled. And Hubzilla not being based on ActivityPub and technically being bridged to Mastodon via its own per-channel bridges would be only one out of many possible reasons to want it “gone from the Fediverse”.

    • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah swear. Gardening would be fine if all I cared about was dirt and weeds.

      Fucking me the change you wanna see. Invite your friends to use the platform and post your own shit

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Or I could go to bluesky where that change is already in place.

        • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Bad idea. Bluesky’s just gonna end up like Twitter.

          The Fediverse could get shitty in new ways too, but it can’t get Elon’d. Bluesky eventually will. The future is on the Fediverse. All we’re doing is delaying that future by swapping one corporation for another.

          Though maybe that future needs to be delayed, because the Fediverse needs to lose its “yeah our app can do that thing you want, just edit a few variables in the source code”-style github energy.

          Mastodon is ultimately usable, because I figured it out, but it should have been easier, and needs to get easier. Maybe it has the rise and fall of bluesky to figure that out.

          • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Though maybe that future needs to be delayed, because the Fediverse needs to lose its “yeah our app can do that thing you want, just edit a few variables in the source code”-style github energy.

            Self-defeating: that “github energy” is not going to get lost if first not enough people use the Fediverse that having to make that kind of change at the source level becomes a hindrance.

      • Default_Defect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If all Mastodon wants is linux shit then only linux people are gonna stick around. Never mind that I get the exact same linux posts on bluesky from the same people on top of other topics I care to follow.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    Speaking of things people are better without, I wish everyone would stop using Medium. There’s so many better alternatives - Write Freely, Wordpress, Ghost, just to name a few.

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Mastodon emerges as the clear winner. It’s free from investor influence, ad-free, and controlled by a community that values user autonomy over profit.

    That’s a gross assumption that people care about any of this. The tech-abled and tech-writers are in as much of a bubble as the Democrats were this past election.

    The vast majority of people using social media do so for entertainment and passive news consumption and a ton of rage bait. Who owns or controls it is entirely irrelevant - ex., TikTok.

    Ads? You think people in 2024 still care about ads? I think a lot of them enjoy it. Moreover, if you’re a small or local business, you want a platform that allows you to promote your goods and services. This kind of opportunity is what made social media explode. If you were a community business, would you prefer to operate on a platform that was strictly chronological or one that allowed you to pay to get noticed? What if you were an “influencer”? While normal people may dislike this stuff, it’s this stuff that generates revenue for the platform and, like it or not, increases engagement.

    This lack of openness confines users to BlueSky alone, making it difficult to connect with friends on other platforms without creating a separate account.

    How has this prevented Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, YouTube from succeeding?

    You’re trying to force a platform to do what you want it to do. You’re not objectively looking at what the majority of social media users want. When I tell people about interconnected platforms, they have no clue what that means or why they would want that. They just want one platform.

    You and I recognize the benefits of the Fediverse meaning one application to access many platforms. That may be a reality we observe one day but for now, nothing is fully developed. You’re trying to convince people that robotaxies will replace vehicle ownership today when they’re not done deploying them.

    Mastodon’s structure, lacking an algorithm to push specific content, gives users freedom to create a feed that genuinely reflects their interests. For those who are politically inclined, Mastodon has communities and accounts covering all sides, but there’s no algorithm driving you toward any specific viewpoint.

    If Bluesky has an algorithm, I haven’t seen it. I get chronological posts from the accounts I follow with an occasional and subtle suggestion to follow other similar accounts. Many of the accounts I follow are news outlets, journalists, civic leaders, etc. Some of the accounts I followed on Twitter are finally joining Bluesky while less than a fraction of those are on Mastodon.

    I’ve been using Mastodon more than Bluesky. I like the instance I’m a member of which is operated by people in my physical community. Today I saw that more and more members of my community have joined Bluesky, including my local paper. I can not express the joy I’ve felt this afternoon seeing a platform blossom like the Twitter of old.

    Betamax was superior to VHS. DVD Audio was superior to SACD. You may think the flexibility of Windows or Android makes them superior to MacOS or iOS. Ultimately, it comes down to marketing and convenience.

    How do you make Mastodon better? You have to get brands over there. You have to get journalists and news outlets over there. When CNN reports that someone said something on Twitter, that’s marketing for that platform. When [the news] starts reporting that [celebrity] or [president] posted on Mastodon - then maybe you’ll start getting some traction. But why would that person post something so important on a platform with so few users?

    • [R3D4CT3D]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      i know so many ppl that purchase products: “from an ad i saw on (whatever social media they use)” it blows my mind, seriously.

      • Jimbo@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah absolutely. I have never clicked through an ad on the internet. My click through rate is literally zero. On the incredibly rare instance that I see something I like from an ad, I do some research first then go to the relevant website.

    • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If Bluesky has an algorithm, I haven’t seen it. I get chronological posts from the accounts I follow with an occasional and subtle suggestion to follow other similar accounts. Many of the accounts I follow are news outlets, journalists, civic leaders, etc. Some of the accounts I followed on Twitter are finally joining Bluesky while less than a fraction of those are on Mastodon.

      Bluesky does it even better IMO. Their default feed is a chronological feed of all the people you follow and you can add additional feeds that have their own algorithms (You can even create your own either with simple logic through something like skyfeed.app or code it entirely from scratch). This makes it much easier to choose what you want to see compared to Mastodon.

      The feeds are the strongest feature Bluesky has.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah - it feels more organic to me. Bluesky feels like a more well thought out Twitter. Mastodon feels like something built from Google Wave scraps.

        I’m not sure how much of Dorsey’s DNA is left but it’s hard to imagine someone who has had so much success wouldn’t know what they’re doing. The board could certainly screw it up, just as Twitter’s did by selling, but it seems like they’re growing slowly and doing things in a productive way. Slow and intentionally growth seems to be the growing trend in tech.

        With that said, I’m aware of the funding concerns and I’m trying to pay attention. Where will their money come from is still a question. Will they use ads or subscriptions? I’d prefer the option for either and not both. Is it actually an issue that someone tied to blockchain is involved? I’m not sure but I’m open to a plausible argument.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s a gross assumption that people care about any of this.

      For any form of federated community to be sustainable, its users have to care about that. Otherwise those communities will eventually be consumed by whichever instance gains the critical mass to close itself off and become another Twitter or Reddit.

      To achieve the benefits of federation, users must be educated on principles of federation, not be obfuscated from them. The question is how the Fediverse can do that.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I fully agree. This is why it won’t work. I dunno - maybe Gen Alpha or Gen Beta will care about this, assuming there’s a pendulum swing?

      • ProtonFiber@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Bridgy.fed is nice for bridging also for using both at the sametime. I think what a lot of people like on BlueSky is the feed algorithm without having to curate yourself like on Mastodon or posts sorted by the time it was posted. That probably makes a huge difference.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It will be interesting to see which one wins out, like how Lemmy won out vs kbin/mbin, since kbin never accepted any outside help and stopped contributing. Not really putting the open in open-source that way, IMO.

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Bluesky wins out.

        Sorry, but there’s companies and interest groups at play here. No one is championing Mastodon but us fossy poors.

        Would kinda be nice if I dunno… Harvard or, Brown maybe would take an interest in privacy focused social media and start lobbying for and spreading it.

        We have companies spending billions on bullshit, with nobody spending a cent on truth.

      • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I picked kbin for no particular reason and then moved to lemmy. Kbin was a dumpster fire of spam and downtime. Seems to be permanently broken as of the last 2 months minimum

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s a shame, I wanted to like KBin because it’s PHP and I specialize in PHP (also JS and Java), but the maintainer just made sure that it wasn’t sustainable.

        • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          When /kbin was zerg-rushed after the Reddit enshittification, it wasn’t ready yet. It was a public alpha. It had five instances, all official, all experimental, only one of them public. I guess the dev had intended to calmly and orderly develop it until it’d be ready for prime-time. But all of a sudden, it was either developing missing features or removing bugs for those who daily-drove it in this state in expectation of it being a stable point release.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just to add to the many responses here with a simple quip on this issue (which I’m taking from one else)

    The fediverse presumes people care more about independence than socialising. For most it’s the other way around.

    IE: it’s about the socialising “stupid”.

    Even for us techy types happy with the system here … it means we get to socialise with like minded people. The independence we have here is often secondary, I’d wager, to what we all get out of this.

    • KenTheEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Nope. Every post I’ve seen about Bluesky has me confused for this exact reason. If it wasn’t for people talking about Lemmy in mass on another platform, I’d have no idea what the Fediverse is.

  • ohlaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Mastadon is nice. I like Bluesky better. I think if they can eventually talk between the two, they will both win.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      A summary of the standard mastodon front page:

      1. News report about Trump
      2. The temperature in Sudan
      3. The travel trajectory of a plane carrying people you’ve never heard of, going somewhere you’ve never heard of.
      4. A penis
      5. Ai art of Bart Simpson and a worm from Dune
      6. An AOC quote
      7. Furry porn, diaper optional
      8. A Linux distro professing a new update
      9. Someone’s Chaos Space Marine (it actually looks really nice and they really took their time)

      I like it in a flea market kinda sense but, I mean, come on, man.

      • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m not really following what’s the issue here? Sounds like a wide variety of content that is the perfect medium to find people to follow so you can get a more filtered and curated feed, which mastodon comfortably supports.

        I don’t know any social media that boasts a decent news feed that you put 0 information into.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Now there’s an argument to be had. I ave tried Mastodon and Firefish and found the latter to be far superior, feature-wise. I think Iceshrimp will be the *key fork that will finally the big breakout hit, especially with the Iceshrimp.net rewrite.

              • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Misskey and the actual Forkeys are in TypeScript and Vue.js. And they all have the same bugs that you can’t just simply get rid of.

                Iceshrimp.NET is a rewrite of Iceshrimp in C#, that’s why it’s named Iceshrimp.NET. It promises to get rid of all issues inherited from Misskey because it doesn’t have a bit of Misskey left in it anymore.

                But maybe we need more rewrites in more languages to satisfy as many people as possible. A Catodon rewrite in Ruby on Rails for Mastodon fanbois and fangurlz, no matter what a chonker it’ll end up being. Sharkey rewritten in PHP to satisfy those who like things as easy and lightweight as Friendica & Co. And even more because not few say that both C# and Ruby on Rails and PHP suck.

                Or is there anything that doesn’t suck at all? Go sucks because Google. Rust sucks because Mozilla. Python sucks because it’s Python being Python. And so forth.