• maskquerade@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s one of the few places on the internet that still allows freedom of speech.

      The last thing I want is to be stuck with curated spaces where people like you get to decide what I get to see.

        • maskquerade@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you don’t like it, you don’t have to use it.

          The idea that anywhere that allows saying the N is only comprised of nazis is retarded. (so it makes sense a lot of you would believe it.)

            • Icytrees@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Undeterred “free speech” has a self-limiting feedback loop where the most extreme views shared by a majority of users eventually drown out minority views. Threats and insults are a kind of self moderation in communities like those, they incentivise uniformity in opinions and demographic while deterring minority/disenfranchised groups from interacting, which is exactly what happened with 4Chan. For example, as of 2025 roughly 80% of 4Chan users are male compared to, say, Tumblr’s 49%

              Formal moderation, while not always well done, is a way to protect diverse opinions.

  • spez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I might not like what you have to say, but I’ll defend to death, your right to say it kinda shit

      • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is an obvious reason why countries like Germany make a strong stance against any “trolling” nazi joke/imagery/salute.

        But America’s First Amendment seems to not understand that reason (or only understand when it is weaponized against communism, black people, trans rights and all the “woke culture” stuff)

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          America’s first amendment doesn’t grant a total right to free speech. Conspiracy to commit murder is just speech, but is very much illegal, and so is copyright infringement.

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Germany make a strong stance against any “trolling” nazi joke/imagery/salute

          And look how that’s working for them: clamping down on pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitism, raids & arrests over calling a politician pimmel.

          America’s First Amendment seems to not understand that reason

          The 1st Amendment “understands” just fine. You don’t understand and want a thought-police state.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Everyone has a different definition, but yeah generally free speech in an ideal sense extends to just before you start causing what a reasonable person would concern harm to someone.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fuck that. People spreading racial hate and public lies with the intention to mislead the public should be locked up.

          • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I would say intent matters and while it’s impossible to truly determine it, we still have a distinction for murder/manslaughter and negligence.

            If a politician lies or hides something for personal gain, that should be illegal, but there’s so much stuff the state does where it’s best if the general public don’t know, public order would probably break down pretty quickly otherwise.

            Same with racial hate. If it’s just stating an opinion, fine, I probably don’t agree but go ahead. If you’re actively trying to harm (mentally, economically, socially or physically) that group, or inciting others to do the same, then that’s not fine.

            • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              I can’t think of where “racial hate” could possibly be “just stating an opinion” without also causing harm that is both mental and social.

              • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                It depends how you define “racial hate” and how you define mental or social harm. I also do mean social harm, not societal, meaning to catch things like sunset communities (ie restricting where people can live, or where they can go), rather than “society is worse off because of people’s opinions.”

                Again, in my opinion, it depends on intent. If you make a post on your blog with 200 followers saying “I’m tired of X race moving to my city,” I don’t think that should be illegal, even if it is disgusting behaviour. If you post it to (eg) a community group for those people, I’d say it should be illegal.

                That said, I’m very liberal on policing, so believe that the state shouldn’t be responsible for policing morality, which people may not like when they realise it involves making things that are pretty much objectively immoral legal, regardless of what they are.

                • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You seem to think that if something is indirect it isn’t harmful, so being openly racist with your friends is OK as long as you’re not telling the people you’re dehumanizing directly? Sounds like you would think cheating on your wife is OK as long as she didn’t find out.

                  Personally, I don’t think there is any good or acceptable racial hatred, and pretending that there is is what got the neofascists so much political clout around the world.

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        hate speech

        Nope: unless you’re arguing people are mindless automatons who must act on whatever message they’re exposed to, people can be expected to self-control.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Are you saying if you listen to hatespeech all day, then you feel compelled to commit violent acts? Or are you saying you need to lock others away for speech that merely offends you?

            If the former, then maybe you need to be locked up. If the latter, then you need help working on your authoritarian tendencies begging for a thought police.

    • WALLACE@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The permission of unrestricted hate speech is what leads the people like your current president being your current president.

  • justadudeingear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well the internet is written mostly by bots. Everything needs Id and spying. We may end up building a new internet so fuck the old internet

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Oh meshtastic is really cool but even without GPS broadcasting, it is FAR from private. There are some serious flaws with its encryption apparently that the devs don’t want to address, and im like 99% sure you can just be triangulated anyway.

        That being said, meshtastic is awesome and everyone should try it. Its a lot of fun and you can “meet” cool people in your community who are kind of makerspace-adjacent and usually kind in general.

        Also don’t listen to the meshcore grifters, meshcore is proprietary and requires you to pay for licenses to use its full feature set. They’re like reverse Linux users who just show up whenever meshtastic is mentioned to try to convince you to give your freedoms away.

          • Semperverus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            So the radio mesh range depends on a couple factors but the short answer is “yes, easily.”

            The long answer is that the world record for longest direct meshtastic/LoRa message is 90km, but you can easily get 1/10th that with some buildings and whatnot blocking the way. Getting really good antennas and sticking a node way up high like in your attic, on your roof, or in a tree and using a personal device closer to the ground that bounces off of it is the most “ideal” scenario for a home setup. I currently talk with people three cities over regularly, and there are about 110 nodes in my area and constantly growing.

            Because there are no cellphone towers, you’re kind of responsible for getting your node high up if nobody else has set up a ROUTER node on a nearby mountain (by the way the router role is not the same as your home router, its supposed to be like a cellphone tower but way up on a mountain, not a rooftop of a tall building).

            And if you’re the first person in your area, Heltec often sells their chipsets in 2 pack bundles with cases and batteries. Give one to a friend and ask them to pay it forward if they like it!

            If you want to get started, you have two basic starter choices: the cheaper Heltec V3 (or now V4) based on ESP32, or the more expensive Heltec T114 based on RAK. The former is more powerful but drains battery like crazy, and the latter is more power efficient but lacks features like Store & Forward. There are other brands of board makers, but Heltec is the entry tier (and both are pretty solid from what I can tell of the two units I have). There is lots of room for DIY builds too if you are looking to do custom shells for on-person devices or enclosures+beefy antennas for outdoor units.

    • rose56@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Let’s start with who they going to fine, and which domains will they Ban!
      But yea, it could happen.

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        4chan is full of assholes, but blocking websites is pretty fucked. what person wants their government doing that?

        • WALLACE@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          None of us do. Most of us have started using VPNs ever since this law came into effect.

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would normally be sympathetic to their stand except earlier this year when this first started, they called on Trump to use all available political leverages to prevent this and protect free speech. Calling on Trump to protect free speech is just absolutely ridiculous.

  • F_State@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well fuck the UK but lolz at 4chan. Once, long ago, they were a place to watch faces of death type stuff. And it went downhill from there.