Plex has announced a massive price increase on the service’s Lifetime Plex Pass. On July 1, the lifetime subscription option will go from $249.99 to $749.99, an increase of 200%. The price hike will only apply to new subscribers, with no changes to monthly or annual subscription pricing.

    • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      As someone who picked up lifetime for like $45 or whatever it was (I think a 50% off sale?) what must have been 15 years ago…

      I run jellyfin. Its just a better experience IMO.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m sorry but you can hate Plex and prefer jellyfin all you want, but you don’t have to lie. Nothing about jellyfin is a “better experience” than Plex.

        What are some examples?

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Don’t have to make an account, for starters. Gives you more detailed control of transcoding options, audio playback and whatnot.

          The UI is worse, that much is true, but that’s not the end all be all of user experience.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Making an account is what allows the easy library sharing and remote streaming, something that Plex is significantly better than JellyFin at.

            What transcoding options does it have that Plex doesn’t?

            • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              How is Plex significantly better than Jellyfin at those things? I can just create a user in 2 seconds on the admin dashboard for Jellyfin, set a temporary password and my friend can log in and change it to whatever they want.

              I can even limit the streaming bitrate to the account if I need to avoid bandwidth issues.

              • keyez@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                They mentioned remote streaming which jellyfin doesn’t have a secure way to do by itself

                • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Does Plex? Have they ever been security audited or are we just taking the word of closed source software because they make it easier? Like Microsoft who just got caught adding backdoors into billions of computers and (pick one) closed source software company who has had major security breaches in the last decade.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Unless your user comes and logs in on your network, and only streams when they’re at your house, then you’ve just opened your server to the world.

                Plex has bandwidth controls.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      A gentle reminder that Jellyin more or less requires you to set up a reverse proxy and a secure VPN to use it outside of your home.

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because if I’m watching locally I dont need them, and if I’m watching remotely Plex already offers secure remote viewing 'out of the box`. They give every user an SSL certificate and a public accessible URL at app.plex.tv. They also handle secure user authentication. The new price is stupid, but Jellyfin is not a 1:1 replacement.

  • iamthetot@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    I know that whales exist, but seriously… Who is into self hosting but also into dropping $750 on a service that can end on a whim?

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think it is safer to say they don’t prefer it. If they didn’t want you to buy it at all, they could discontinue the offering today.

        • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Its like when a contractor quotes you a ridiculous price because they dont want to do the work. They assume you are going to say no, they dont want to do it. But if you say yes to their absurb price they are happy to take your money.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    The company’s blog post also described a number of improvements they plan to make

    After you pay: “oops, we won’t”

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      As a lifetime owner, the number of features they’ve deprecated is probably the worst part.

      • Photo support (luckily Immich came along)
      • Tidal integration (no idea if that was Plex or Tidal’s decision)
      • Plugins (god forbid anyone add the functionality they keep removing)

      It’s close between that and the last app overhaul that removed a bunch of functionality.

  • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    So basically, they just want to phase our the lifetime plan, but they know removing it outright would cause outrage so they “just” increase the price to massively lower interest and then say: “Well nobody wanted it so we removed the product”.

    I swear to god plex and the profiteering sons of bitches behind it can go fuck themselves.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The make more off of FAAS then lifetime sub’s. More of their users are FAAS users them stream your own.

  • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zonedeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Jellyfin has lots and lots of tutorials, fyi. it’s not as intimidating as it seems once you get going with it.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    I “defend” plex against silly complaints, but jesus christ that is one giant leap for no gain. That’s stupid, no one will pay that - though I tend to think that’s the whole point.

  • xnx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wish jellyfin and the apps could ship with something like wireguard setup by default so people that use the jellyfin apps could instantly watch media outside their house without learning what wireguard/tailscale is

  • WandowsVista@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    there are a lot of us still on Plex that hadn’t reached the threshold of issues vs effort that would motivate us to migrate to something like jellyfin.

    looks like we’ve arrived.

    • hefty4871@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I already have a lifetime Plex pass so this isn’t an issue for me. 6 months from now when Plex decides my lifetime pass has a new expiry, then I’ll be motivated.

      • WandowsVista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        this exactly. I got a lifetime pass in the before times (pre-pandemic) back when they were $100 bucks ish, but I know it’s only a matter of time before they come for us grandfathered-in fools.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have the lifetime pass, bought it for like $80 many moons ago.

      looks like we’ve arrived.

      Agreed, this is the tipping point. This is where we will see Plex start to abandon the lifetime pass in favor of “imaginary money line go up forever” subscriptions.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I haven’t. I bought lifetime Plex Pass something like 15 years ago. A price change doesn’t effect me. It’s all their shitty updates and removing of features that makes me keep an eye on Jellyfin. I already have a sync setup for my watch status and a couple of my main users. Jellyfins apps are still worse.

  • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Jellyfin vs Plex thing always struck me as odd. As in - why are we holding JF to a different standard to (say) Immich, Syncthing, Pi-hole or any one of a thousand different programs people self host?

    Yes, JF ships multi-user accounts and client apps etc. I get it, “multi-use” is implied, so the comparison isn’t totally unfair. But there’s a difference between ‘this feature exists’ and ‘this is the primary purpose of the tool’.

    The fact that you CAN share it externally doesn’t mean everyone running JF is doing that, or that it should be the benchmark the whole project is judged by.

    To me, self host means “I host it, myself” not “I host it and then pretend to be Netflix for family and friends”. If that’s the use case, then of course, Plex away.

    It’s cool that you CAN share JF externally, and it’s cool that Plex does that differently / better. We shouldn’t hold one to the standards of the other.

  • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    they must be tired of running that company.

    Is the whole world right now like me at the very end of a SimCity 3000 game, when it’s time to just turn on all the catastrophies?

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Its so much less cool than that.

      Business leaders have finally gotten the legal oversight landscape set up so the cash register is being monitored by a blind baby that was dropped on its head, so they’re all just lining up robbing the place.

      The end-game plan seems to be to keep it up until things go all Mad Max, then hide in underground vaults until that blows over and start it again.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just out of interest as someone who has recently set up a Jellyfin server - what’s the main “value add” of using Plex compared to Jellyfin?

    It seems to do everything I want, so I’m not sure why people would pay for Plex over the FOSS version.

    • hedders@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      For me, the killer app for Plex is Plexamp, the music client. It’s superb, and AFAIK Jellyfin doesn’t really have an equivalent (there are 3P options, but they’re lacking).

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        For me (Android) I have used these:

        • Finamp
        • Default Jellyfin App
        • Symfonium

        And Symfonium can do many sources and is the moat powerful.
        Finamp is neat but couldnt do casting to my soundbar via google cast

    • spizzat2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you accessing your media from outside of your network?

      I have heard that you need to set up a VPN for Jellyfin to securely use your media library remotely. Plex handles all of that for me so that I don’t need to deal with it.

      • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I do not, and don’t plan to. Probably wouldn’t be that hard to set up though as someone familiar with nginx.

        I guess Plex uses their own VPN under the hood then to make it more convenient?

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yep, and it generally has fewer sharp corners. Like last time I checked, in order to set up quick sync, you have to manually check each codec you want to offload to hardware. And if you select one that isn’t supported by your hardware, you find out when you try to play that. So it means carefully cross-referencing with the Wikipedia page for your quick sync version. Plex just has an enable hardware transcoding check box and it figures it out for you.

          There’s also some features like smart playlists that I remember needing to set up plugins for whereas Plex supports it out of the box.

          Of course ther are other things where jellyfin comes out ahead, like surround to stereo down mixing - I could never get the center channel (dialog) to be at a good volume when down mixed to stereo on my TV, but it just works and produces the correct volume in jellyfin.

          But ultimately I think what causes all my users to prefer Plex is that the official app is polished and consistent across all platforms. The official jellyfin one looks like a programmer put it together with bootstrap components, and my favorite alternatives (like findroid) are in active development (I do donate on a reoccurring basis though in hopes that it reaches a level of polish matching Plex)

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t think transcoding is that difficult if you’ve already set up your own server. Like, that’s only a thing the admin would have to figure out and it’s a quick lookup.

            I do agree with the client UI issue tho, and would like to add that the lack of a per-user watchlist is a pretty baffling decision given that it’s been widely requested for years and years and it would make it enormously more comfortable.

            • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              It’s not, and I didn’t say it was hard. Just that it’s a sharp corner that jellyfin should fix if they want to make it as one click as Plex is. It’s another part of the setup where you have to pay attention and get every check box right or it’ll not work as intended. I found it annoying to have to look it up and I’ve been in software for 15 years. I don’t doubt that any newb would find it frustrating. I remember seeing that it was planned to have hardware transcoding codec support auto detected but IDK if that has happened yet.

              It’s especially annoying because jellyfin doesn’t just copy the support matrix into their docs, and the one on Wikipedia is by processor generation codename, so you have to look up your processor and get the codename, then reference the Wikipedia table and go down each codec and not make a mistake. Even though it’s “not hard” I still go back to that section because I second guess that I checked everything right thinking that I’ve caused some issues with a mistake. It’s additional cognitive load that isn’t worth defending if you want jellyfin to be good.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ease of use, and actual secure and usable external access.

      Friends/family make an account and tell you their account name or email address, you invite them to your library and that’s it, they can watch/listen to your media on pretty much any device they have. No vpn needed.

      Jellyfin is not meant to be exposed to the internet for remote viewing. It also doesn’t have a client on most devices people use to watch tv/movies.

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Huge disagree on the last part. Jellyfin has a bunch of Android, Roku, Google tv and PC clients. I struggle to think of a device me or my friends use that has a Plex client but not a Jellyfin one.

    • fluffy@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Plexamp is just far superior for music. It doesn’t even come close sadly … since I only use it for my music collection I simply prefer Plex … but only because I got lifetime a long time ago for 60 bucks or something …

  • db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    I got this on Black Friday many years ago for ~70 and despite the pass I am slowly moving over to Jellyfin. I really don’t see how they came up with this valuation, seems like a last money squeeze before abandoning ship.