• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’ve all been playing Mario Kart with our minds already, using our mind to manipulate those fleshy sticks attached to our shoulders. It’s fuckin amazing.

    The only usefulness this has is to help someone who can’t do that. And the fact that it’s attached to Elon and that all previous test subjects died and that it’s still been put in a human is pretty dystopian.

    • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The only usefulness this has is to help someone who can’t do that.

      I can’t tell if you know that the patient is quadriplegic?

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I can’t tell if you know Musk wants everyone to buy his dangerous deadly crap.

        • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe, but that is not particularly relevant to the article, and

          We’ve all been playing Mario Kart with our minds already, using our mind to manipulate those fleshy sticks attached to our shoulders. It’s fuckin amazing.

          is quite an ableist thing to say when the subject at hand is a literal quadriplegic person playing Mario Kart.

              • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Probably thinks that I’m a Elon Musk fan, when the exact opposite is true. Why denounce a Musk-owned company for improving the life of a quadriplegic person when there are a million more valid criticisms to be made?

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      All previous animal test subjects died, including the majority that were euthanized at the end of the test period for dissection and study. There was a super high failure rate but let’s not misrepresent what actually happened.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, it’s at the very edge of what science can do and realistically there’s not that much else you could do except test on relatively highly developed animals. You’d kind of expect that to happen, but I don’t see a viable alternative.

        • xxd@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Working on the bleeding edge of scientific research does not relieve someone of treating animals with ethical consideration. A “move fast and break things” approach might be good for a startup and maybe even for a rocket company, but that approach isn’t okay if “breaking things” includes living, feeling animals.

            • Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Use a fucking EEG device, instead of opening their skulls and messing with their brains.

              • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Huh, it’s almost like that has its limitations and they want to find a way past that or something…….

                Yes let’s just stop at eeg since nothing could possibly advance on that… what an absolutely asinine ignorant fucking viewpoint.

                  • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Awwwh did someone learn a new word of the day and is trying to use it every chance they get? Even if it doesn’t apply at all?

                    Why are you shilling an inferior product that can’t accomplish the same thing?

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          We’ve had brain-computer interfaces for DECADES, which didn’t need to be inside the skull. This isn’t bleeding-edge research, it’s just a bloody edge used to kill research subjects.

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            EEG is an extremely limited tech, they are looking for a way to advance past those limitations.

            We can’t just not advance ever since someone might get hurt, that’s just asinine.