The Los Angeles Police Department has warned residents to be wary of thieves using technology to break into homes undetected. High-tech burglars have apparently knocked out their victims’ wireless cameras and alarms in the Los Angeles Wilshire-area neighborhoods before getting away with swag bags full of valuables. An LAPD social media post highlights the Wi-Fi jammer-supported burglaries and provides a helpful checklist of precautions residents can take.

Criminals can easily find the hardware for Wi-Fi jamming online. It can also be cheap, with prices starting from $40. However, jammers are illegal to use in the U.S.

We have previously reported on Wi-Fi jammer-assisted burglaries in Edina, Minnesota. Criminals deployed Wi-Fi jammer(s) to ensure homeowners weren’t alerted of intrusions and that incriminating video evidence wasn’t available to investigators.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those aren’t always options for renters, hence why wifi security systems are so popular.

      • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even beyond renting, installing a wifi camera is SO much cheaper than running Ethernet all over your house. And if you need it run through an external wall? Even more money.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not if you DIY. I just finished a project, not only wiring all rooms for Ethernet, but PoE for 10 exterior cameras.

          You can get 500ft Cat 5e boxes off eBay for like ~$20, an extra long 1/2 inch drill bit (for punching through the exterior wall) was like another 20. Most expensive part was probably the metal conduit for the outside runs (I decided to only have 2 or 3 holes to the outside and run the cables in the conduit along the soffit to converge to one of 3 exterior holes for final routing within the house. That was probably 150-250)

          All in all after estimating for secondary costs, like screws, brackets, sealant, a caulk gun, ceiling bracket for ceiling routing indoors etc this project was probably <400, pretty cheap as far as home improvement projects go

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Do you really need either when you’re running the cable down the soffit where it’ll never really get exposed to sun or rain?

              • hemmes@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                No - I use some standard stuff in areas like that, when I’m able to come right out and under the soffit or siding. If I have to make a run, closer to the ground, with a brick facade, I’ll use it. I won’t go crazy actually trying to burry it when it stays near my house hidden by shrubs.

                I have buried it for customers that require connections located in dislocated structures - trenches and filling by others though. 😅

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Good because I didn’t use either and also tucked mine up in the soffit albeit with some short runs before they go into the attic. It is not something I’d like to revisit 😆

        • The Pantser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not that expensive to do it yourself. Getting a fish tape and a cheaper Ethernet termination kit would set you back at most $50. Only other tools you need is a drill and most homeowners should already have that. And a really long bit is cheap at harbour freight.

        • Obinice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even beyond renting, installing a wifi camera is SO much cheaper than running Ethernet all over your house. And if you need it run through an external wall? Even more money.

          A bit of plastic trunking, an ethernet cable, and a long masonry bit for your hammer drill to get through the brick wall, oh and a little sealant, not that expensive, I believe in you!

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lawful- Neutral renter reporting in:

        • Fresh paint and a lot of putty hide a lot of sins
        • Magic erasers ARE magic
        • Home improvement stores just like sell door trim, hardware, etc and they’ll color match paint
        • Most post-inspectors are looking for egregious issues or evidence of a bad fix/cleanup. That’s now your threshold for quality

        I fixed an entire doorframe trim and drywall after the back door got kicked in - paint and putty are your friends

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Renters have virtually no choice here. I hate it when people state this like it’s some damn easy thing for everyone to do.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The real answer is caching. Instead of writing video to the cloud live and losing all recordings during a wifi outage, it should just cash the last 30ish minutes in case of failure to connect to the cloud. Then once the connection is up again, it just uploads the cached video.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          My cameras are PoE going to an NVR but you can also slap SD cards in them to record locally. I’m sure there are some wireless options out there with this feature included. Unfortunately wireless cameras have another glaring flaw in that they only record on movement and I’ve heard of so many stories where they didn’t catch any movement to start recording when something happened.

      • iamjackflack@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I beg to differ not with that attitude. In most situations you can non permanently get a camera out a window or door without harming anything / risking deposit loss. Only where you have no windows near exit points and a windowless door. But even then you can still atleast have something internal to catch a break in (wired streaming to web).

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s no OSFA solution. Yeah, it sucks if you’re renting and can’t run cat 6 everywhere. All the same, you can still run a hard wired cam to a NVR/NAS in at least one location inside, but then you face the same difficulty anyone else does of securing the storage from theft - or you can have it upload to a cloud as quickly as is practical so you get off-site storage images and alerts of the theft.

        There’s a lot of opportunistic thefts near where I live. Honestly, the odds of actually catching a good image of the thieves’ faces are petty low. If they know enough to jam the wifi, they also probably know enough to hide their faces. The thieves in our area all wear hoodies and hide their faces somehow, so all you get is the alert that someone is there and an image of a hoodied individual.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Neither is PoE when the thieves drop a bit of foil onto the local transformer with a drone.

          • DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not saying this is what the backup batteries on my modem and in my rack are specifically for, but it would definitely prevent downtime from a Droney McTinFoil von Transformer scenario

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honestly super easy. I have a pet cam that records locally to an SD card and is accessible via wifi. A jammer wouldn’t stop the recording. Also like 30 bucks vs 50-100-200 bucks depending on which ring cam you get. Certainly not weatherized but good enough for internal monitoring.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      IMHO, it comes down to your risk, what will make you feel comfortable, and how much money you want to spend. Pulling Ethernet through the walls and patching drywall might not be something you care to do if risk is low.

      Also, if someone really wants to not be on camera, they’ll wear a mask, turn the power off at the main panel, etc. That said, there are cameras that can run on battery and store footage locally when they can’t phone home to wherever they deposit video files.

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        My entire 12 camera system is ethernet only which feeds into my server closet and backed up with a battery that can run it for 5 hours. The video clips are sent to telegram for backup.

            • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Right, but they offer basically unlimited storage or how does that specific bit work? I wasn’t aware you could put meaningful amounts of data anywhere using a telegram bot.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I guess my point is that there is no right or wrong camera system. It’s a balance between risk, convenience, and peace of mind / perceived safety.

          I used design hardcore security checkpoint systems for the DHS, and even I have stupid WiFi cameras. I’m going to see diminishing returns if I go with a more old-school hardwired system. The people who do break in sprees in my area have been getting past me those things for decades.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, if you have a $10M villa in LA where you store your priceless art collection invest in hard security. For the average person who just needs video for the insurance company for when some meth head steals their bike from the garage, it’s a great solution.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most people these days have either a ring doorbell camera or nothing. A very few people have real security cameras hardwired, and even fewer of those have more than 1 camera.

      Also, about 1/4 of the ring doorbell cams need their batteries replaced.

      PoE/CCTV is def the better option, but youre gonna be hard pressed to get regular folks to make the switch unless this type of burglary becomes endemic.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. We have a mix of wifi/hard wired PoE. If you can handle crawling around in the attic or wherever, PoE is the easiest and best option. No need to run wiring to any sort of electrical box to power 110v for cams. Wireless is super-easy, but usually you have to pay for cloud services on top of that. Home hard wired with an NVR or NAS is the way to go.

    • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right?? I don’t understand this attack. People are lazy and far too trusting to have their home feeds uploaded over the internet

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cheap wireless cloud connected security cameras are the reason home surveillance is so ubiquitous today. Many people don’t have the know-how to install POE cameras, or it’d cost them too much to pay someone to do it. Plus, if you’re renting your house, putting the holes you’d need where they’re supposed to go is something you might not even be allowed to do.

        I fully understand the attack. It’s effective against the majority of people.

        • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s one of the easier things to DIY though, much easier than setting up a printer or installing a TV. Also, it’s about the same price if not cheaper, I got 1tb harddrive, 4 cameras, cables and and OS for under $200

          I’m just tired of these excuses on why we give away our data and then are surprised when their security is trash

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s one of the easier things to DIY though, much easier than setting up a printer or installing a TV

            I don’t think that’s true at all, and also like I said before if you rent it’s literally not an option unless you can do it without drilling holes.

            Also, it’s about the same price if not cheaper, I got 1tb harddrive, 4 cameras, cables and and OS for under $200

            Well no, a Wyze cam is like $25. So that’s not “The same price if not cheaper”, it’s twice the cost.

            • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I’m not familiar with Wyze but Ring and Nest doorbells go for $50-$200 per camera plus a month subscription if they want to keep the data, so still cheaper

              And they do have magnets to allow for non drilling options if that’s a requirement. I should also stipulate if the person installing it has the physical ability, the setting up the computer side is easy enough for a novice and simpler than installing Windows/MacOSX

              My argument is not go the easy, convenient route. Fast food is nice in a pinch, but eating it every day leads to bad outcomes. And I’m not saying the consumer is 100% to blame, but they aren’t innocent bystanders, especially if they are spending money to protect valuables, why not learn which tools are available and when to use what

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The thieves are jamming WiFi systems and the comments on the article and on Lemmy seem to blame the victim for not being tech savvy. The bulk of Nest/Ring customers do so because the app is easy to use and the cameras easy to setup. By definition the victims are far less likely to be able to defend against this kind of jamming attack.

    If the next step in escalation is to shut down the power to the house, will the victim be blamed for not having home batteries and solar panels?

    Why not question the viability of WiFi systems in general? Has video ever been more than a deterrent to those scared of cameras? Fearless thieves who know how to deter the systems get free loot for their trouble.

    Treat security like we did before 2010; improve physical security to defend instead of relying on deterrence.

    • Entropywins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, it’s not really a spike in burglaries so much as a spike in a specific tool being used in burglaries. Whether they use a brick, wifi jammer or a gun they were going to rob someone someway…

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or a hoodie. I’m not sure why it’s a big g deal to WiFi jam a video doorbell when you can also defeat it with a hoodie …. Plus that’s not a burglar alarm.

        Whoever is peddling anything as a burglar alarm that depends on WiFi is the real criminal

    • WhyFlip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      LAPD is recommending cutting back shrubbery and coordinating with neighbors for extended leave… As a Los Angeles native, neither of these things happen. After all, high walls make for good neighbors.

    • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t know why everyone doesn’t do what I did. I have a WiFi doorbell camera but I also have 13 other cameras that cover the entire perimeter of my house connected to a PoE switch. My switch is on an UPS and connected to an outlet my natural gas generator cutover powers. My office (includes my miniPC running HAOS and frigate) is also on an UPS plugged into outlets my generator cutover powers in a locked cage inside a vented drawer with a 120mm exhaust fan to keep air circulation going in the drawer. All motion is recorded and saved to my local NAS (that is in the same locked cage) for 30 days and it syncs the recordings directory to the cloud. I have isolated cameras that look like usb chargers that record motion on a loop to 128GB micro sd cards aimed at all entry/exit points, hallways, and points is interest. Everything is pretty much set it and forget it. I get notified of any motion on my property regardless of my location and the jpeg captures are immediately sent to a dedicated email I setup should something unforeseen happens to the recorded video. If my or my partners cell phone is not on the WiFi all the cameras (except the doorbell and isolated ones) are set to siren mode on movement detection and they are surprisingly loud especially if two or three are going off at once.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know why everyone doesn’t do what I did.

        1. Your setup is fucking insane, and I mean that in a good way. As someone who ran a small team focused on security and who entertained more than one “I totally sploited our OS/let me show you how we suck today so we can fix it” conversations with dizzyingly smart zealots, this setup has excellent layering and coverage. Well fucking done.

        2. Cost. The same people who say “I’m on a pension so they can’t steal much from me” without realizing their retirement savings and credit rating are the golden fucking goose, also won’t see the benefits to such a cost in capital and setup labour. They won’t do it, and they’ll see us as nutcases until the leopards have eaten their face.

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I was making a joke using the absurdity of what I put together as a hobby project over the past couple years as an example to reinforce the comment I replied to. I’ve spent my whole career in IT and it’s absurd the level of knowledge a lot of career or even hobbyist IT folks expect the general public to have.

          My generator cost $8k installed.

          I ran all the cables myself, still cost $1k for the materials.

          Doorbell camera $200.

          PoE cameras averages to $174 each or ~$2,500

          UPS’s: $300 combined

          MiniPC: $500

          Cage and mounts: $150

          Isolated cameras: $30 ea

          SD cards: $15 ea

          All told I have over $13k invested easily and it would easily be over twice as much without knowing how to do it myself. Anyone giving folks shit for using WiFi security systems is out of touch.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Fence with a lock on it is a lot cheaper. Crazy how much people will spend on surveillance, given how little it does to achieve deterrence.

  • Fillicia@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s one of the reason I went with a PoE camera. Just make sure your network is isolated so people can’t connect to your internal network from the camera Ethernet cable.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or vice versa, connect to your cameras from the rest of your network.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t hurt to hide or disguise the cameras to make them difficult to spot. That way, burglars wouldn’t even try to find and break their server if they’re not noticed.

  • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    before getting away with swag bags full of valuables

    So just look for the guy who looks like he’s just been to four different network admin conferences?

  • FlashZordon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    Worked at an old job where one guy, that had access to the router settings, would disable the Blink Cameras so he could forge his time cards.

    Owners ended up realizing the cameras would only be disabled when he was on shift.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I worked at Walmart ages ago and one of the overnight assistant managers would do this and then steal cash out of the cash office until he finally got caught.

    • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      yes, assuming the cables are inaccessible from outside. otherwise it would be easy to cut them.

    • habitualTartare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes but the camera should be in a place that can’t be physically tampered with easily since someone could theoretically unplug the camera and plug into your home network and see all your computers or other devices as if they had stolen your WiFi password. A small risk but it’s better to hardwire it somewhere they would need a ladder to get to or get a camera system that connects to a central box inside the house.

      • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, if it’s not on a WiFi network, it’ll be fine. CCTV is a great example of this. Just wire up some cameras, encrypt the harddrive and put it somewhere difficult to get to. Only way to disable all cameras at once would be an EMP. There are kits for a few hundred $ and all the data stays local

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is one of those things I thought would always remain firmly within the realm of science fiction. Watching movies and reading books growing up, movies like “The Matrix” and books like “Snow Crash” and “Neuromancer,” I’d always be fascinated with high tech burglary. The idea that one could intercept communications, jam frequencies, or anything of the like, always just seemed a bit too out of reach for modern day criminals. And yet, here we are.

    • Damage@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      A jammer is less sophisticated than a crowbar. It’s not like the burglar designs it themselves. Nor are they hacking your network to gain access, they just shut everything down.

    • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s actually not that high-tech… Like jamming a wifi signal is basically like just shouting over someone to prevent them from speaking (or at least from being heard). To make one from scratch, you need a little bit of technical prowess, but it’s definitely a beginner project… But to use one, you literally just turn it on, and maybe choose a frequency. They’re widely available and cheap.

      There are pretty cool sophisticated digital crimes out there though, so take heart!

      • greyfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would think most wifi jamming is just deauth attacks. It is much easier to just channel hop, enumerate clients, and send them deauthentication packets.

        This way you don’t need a particularly powerful radio/antenna, any laptop/hacking tool with Wi-Fi is all you need. There are scripts out there that automate the whole thing, so almost no deep knowledge of wifi protocols are required.

        WPA3 has protected management frames to protect against this but most IoT cameras probably don’t support WPA3 yet.

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s a relatively sophisticated attack though, and like you said is dependent on versions of WPA. It’s easier from a hardware perspective but more complicated software.

          A 2.4 and 5ghz jammer is just simpler. Turn it on, everything fails. Even stuff that doesn’t talk Wi-Fi like Zigbee. Throw 400 and 900mhz on there too and now even residential security sistems will be frozen. It’s just simpler to use brute force for something like this.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    However, jammers are illegal to use in the U.S.

    What is the point of adding this bit for an article about burglaries?

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because it’s relevant? Is this not factual information that readers may or may not have known?

      The availability of hardware changes by a not-negligent degree based on the legality of acquiring it.

      Curious readers likely find information indicating that these shouldn’t be readily available at your local big box store to be pertinent information.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Ostensibly harder to obtain when they’re illegal to stock and sell retail.

      Same reason why you see folks in Japan and the UK obsessed with knife crime rather than gun crime. Obtaining a gun is more difficult to do legally, so fewer people carry them.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m curious if these are actual jammers or just deauth devices.

    It also seems really risky because I think we have three different bands Wi-Fi devices use now?

    • tryitout@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      What do you mean actual jammer? If it puts out RF at a power level greater than the surrounding environment it is a jammer, correct? I would think for this attack to work you could just target the camera freqs used, you don’t have to target the whole home’s WiFi network. Probably a narrower range to focus on.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t think it’s that simple. The newer Wi-Fi standards are broadband (something on the order of 1GHz wide!), so the required power spectral density to block Wi-Fi across all channels is pretty extreme. I don’t think you’re doing that for $40. We should also keep in mind the standards were designed to operate in environments with other unlicensed devices and in the presence of interference.

        If you just want to target the frequencies the cameras are using, that would require a little bit of research skill that I think would elude most criminals. Also, some routers will change frequencies if the interference is bad.

        If I were building such a device I would use off the shelf Wi-Fi hardware and send deauthentication frames to any nearby stations. But even with this approach, there are devices that will ignore such frames now because it’s been a problem.

        • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          WiFi 6 camera probably exist, but most will use WiFi 5 or lower. Theres only 13 channels and of those usually only 3 or ever used due to band overlap.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Lol. None of my smart devices will connect to anything other than a 2.5ghz connection. Only my TV will accept 5g. The range is MUCH narrower than you think. Then figure in that the top 5 or 6 companies provide hardware for 90% of peoples home installations and that pool becomes even smaller. Also, a microwave operates on the same frequency as 2.5 and was a common disconnection problem in the past.

          This is trivially easy.

          • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m down to two 2.4GHz devices over the whole network now.

            The day I can disable it entirely will be a happy one!

  • Hurculina Drubman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    back in the day, the trick was to cut the phone line, then shove the cut wire back in the phone box. wait for the police to come and see that there’s nothing wrong, then you go and burgle.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why did they specifically mention to “secure home DVR recorders”?

    Other than potentially losing some TV or movies, is that really a big deal next to the other items they mention? It seems really odd to mention one of the least important things.

    • higgsboson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No. Think about it. Where is all the video from those cameras going? It is digital video, which the homeowner probably wants to record and playback… Many home security setups, particularly those that don’t rely on a cloud service, are basically a DVR back end with a security focused UI.

      • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve never heard of used outside of a cable box. I didn’t know security setups would be called that.

        But with that information it makes sense.

        You made me one of the 10k today

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s why wireless security devices are a joke. And it is not only WiFi, this is BlueTooth and other protocols like that, too.

    Good security (and common sense, too) would be to have such devices wired up. And check the spectrum for jammers and raise an alarm about that, too.