• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was genuinely looking forward to them refusing to install airbags because it compromised the dashboard being 100% screen, and then later installing airbags in a “notch”, but calling them iBags, and advertising them as a revolutionary new feature that only Apple could think different enough to invent.

  • m0darn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Shifts team to generative AI.

    If your car development team can be transferred to AI developement you weren’t building much of a car.

    • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Except news always was that Apple was pushing pretty hard into self-driving vehicles, which would use much the same AI learning systems as you need for generative AI.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ehh, that’s a bit of a stretch. They’re very different technologies with only limited overlap.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Still, self driving and generative AI are very different. Just because they fall into the same big “AI” bucket doesn’t mean it’s the same.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No one can become a skilled ML/AI dev overnight. That will still take a year or two or more of working with it daily. If you transition to a new field you basically become a junior dev all over again for a while. Domain knowledge is a big part of being a good programmer.

      • Fuck_u_spez_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Even in 2024, there’s still a lot of non-software (automotive) engineering involved in building a car – even an electric one.

    • Formesse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Once upon a time, stoves had a dial you set, and it was basically a resistor and some wires. Today, a stove has a computer built in it that operates the entire thing.

      While the computer in a modern oven is simple - it is an illustration that more, and more of what we have is computerized. When you add in reinforcement learning algorithms to adjust factors like say, If the fridge is aware of what time you generally open the fridge it can opt to kick on the heat pump a little before that to bring the temperature down and avoid running while it is open. This could save pennies of electricity in a year. But more importantly - could lead to less duty cycles on the condesor that could cause a fridge to say instead of lasting 10 years, last 12 years.

      If you are starting a car company today, what you have to be thinking about is a reality where we move to “Humans don’t drive, the cars drive you” - I mean even a manual control situation could have the AI actually being a watcher in effect we “Let” people drive, but if the AI detects an unobserved obstacle etc it immediately takes over and adjusts. Well: You need to build that - and that, is AI.

      If a company isn’t thinking about AI, and makes anything but basic appliances - they are likely on a limited time window because at some point Autonomous cars WILL be good enough, and the safety consideration will make both people, and governments, along with insurance companies to eliminate human driven vehicles.

      Apple isn’t looking next year, or a year after. They are looking 5 to 10 years out and they don’t see a path where they can effectively compete in the car industry and make the profits they are after. However, if they can solve the AI driving problem - they don’t NEED to make a car, they can sell the brains and system that drives the car.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe the i-bike is more appleish? Imagine this, it’s a bike like other bikes, but you only need to pedal with one leg, and if you turn the pedal, the whole bike turns. Tilt it back to stop. Sure, you may look fucking stupid running around with only one pedal while your other leg does nothing at all. That’s it. Oh, and it’s white and smooth in gorme plastic-like design. You can charge your bike but you must remove the seat and turn it upside down using our special turning device since it’s 700lbs.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not sure why everyone’s cheering, more competition is never bad and there are already plenty of manufacturers adding subscriptions and such, I doubt Apple would even have been the worst.

    At the very least, they probably would’ve had a slick UI in a world of crap infotainment UIs.

    However they announced Carplay 2 a few years ago and I’m hoping manufacturers will go ahead with adding that as an option so you could just opt in to Apple UI all over the car and revert back at any time. This is probably the best of both worlds. There are plenty of companies that know quite well how to build a car, they just mostly still all suck at UI.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Apple isn’t competition, Apple is a closed market, more anticompetitive than Microsoft and only undone by the degree of their control.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Don’t worry, I don’t. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

    • Cheerstothe90s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      A problem with apple…Like if my friend has a Toyota, i can borrow that. If they have an icar, I probably couldn’t drive it because I don’t have an iPhone required to start it or apple shoes required to activate the pedals. You know they’d be dicks like that.

      • lilsolar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Warning: unauthorized, non apple certified tyres detected on your iCar. Disabling airbags due to security issue.

        Setting destination to Apple Genius bar.

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Competition usually isn’t bad. Unfortunately, Apple has a tendency to not only be terribly anti-consumer, but also tends to be a trendsetter. They do shitty things, and other companies learn from their example. Thus, the competition becomes a race to the bottom.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      they probably would’ve had a slick UI

      Apple hasn’t had a slick UI since Apple II PC.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was kind of hoping that Apple and Tesla would just feud with each other for control of the “economy-quality product marketed as a luxury-quality product” market share.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Apple can’t compete in that space. Their schtick is producing moderately inexpensive nice looking goods for exorbitant prices that are designed to be impossible to repair by anybody with them.

      Tesla has already corned the market.

      Trying to block people from repairing? check, trying to block sales of used items? check. Getting rid of all the buttons for all the interfaces and making you work with a tablet in the center of the car? Check.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The fear for me was that Apple would grow quickly in the EV space due to its mainstream popularity, and then start doing the ecosystem thing so driving anything but an Apple car makes you a second-class citizen. Obviously it would only support Carplay and not Android Auto, and probably lack any sort of non-Carplay connectivity so you just can’t connect your Android phone to it at all. Presumably it would also have a proprietary charger that doesn’t work with other cars or vice versa.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thank fucking god. Imagine the kind of monetization that would exist inside an Apple car. You think subscription seatwarmers are bad, and they are, but I can guarantee Apple had much worse in mind, and that most companies would simply follow suit.

  • NewPerspective@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I really feel for the engineers and devs who don’t get to see their project released into the world. Especially after so much effort.

      • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I know this is a joke about the stupid Apple mouse, but a car with a bottom (and normal) charging port would be pretty cool. Imagine just pulling into your garage and a giant MagSafe charger snaps to the bottom of your car. (Yes, I know this is unreasonable with current technology due to poor energy efficiency)

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I haven’t looked at the bottom of my car in a while, but judging by the amount of dust, mud and ice I see everywhere else, the bottom probably isn’t very clean. During January the ice coating got so thick that I had trouble opening the back doors. Makes me wonder how the charging port would handle that.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    lmaoooo, I’ve been saying for years there’s no way in heaven or hell apple is making a car, and now look what happens

  • Raxiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Aww and I was looking forward to a chipped windscreen requiring the replacement of the entire cabin, unless the car had ever been in the rain, in which case fuck you buy a new one.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh no all those developments that they introduced all going to stop, like nothing, bugger all, and zip.

    They literally didn’t do anything, they announced the car I think they had a concept vehicle which looked very apple, and then they did nothing at all ever again.

  • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe they relized rhat they cannot trademark the itire and remotely lock it, and sell it for 20 times the price of a regular tire.

  • hamid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Apple was hoping to white label a Chinese ev and slap an iPad in it but the trade war is too hot now for them to deliver.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    TFA: decade-long

    Spell-check: decade-long

    OP: decadelong

    Stop trying to make ‘fetch’ happen, Felicia.