I’ve heard it explained that “hey” used to be more of an urgent way to get someone’s attention, rather than a casual “hello” like it is now, so it sounded rude to some older folks.

  • good_bot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Teachers in 2023: “NOOO you can’t end your sentences with ‘fr fr nocap skibidi’ those aren’t even real words!”

    2033:

  • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    When I was a waiter, there was no shortage of boomers getting genuinely upset with me saying “No problem” as a reply to “thanks”.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I prefer to say no problem over you’re welcome cuz it always (to me) sounds sarcastic/disingenuous when I say you’re welcome

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s like this:

        You have a boss. A wrinkled plus-sized brown business jacket of a man whose idea of “cutting costs” is turning the air conditioner off. If he caught on fire, you wouldn’t piss on him to put him out. How do you address him? “Good morning Mr. Perkins, how are you doing today?”

        You’ve got a war buddy. You met at boot camp, you served in the same company, he splinted your leg in the field, you’re his kids’ godfather. You’d kill and die for this man. How do you address him? “Ah god not this fucking asshole again.”

        Official formal polite language like “Thank you” and “You’re welcome” is the pair of nitrile gloves I put on to handle the really noxious shit that comes my way. “w’thanks man” and “no problem” means I’m willing to handle you with my bare skin.

      • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Absolutely. I could understand it if it was a formal dining place I suppose. But it was a fucking Applebee’s in a 20k population town with one other restaurant lmao

    • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ugggggh I went through this with my (boomer) boss for years until she finally accepted it lmao. Then it was, “WORRIES, CaptFeather! WORRIES!” as a joke every time I said it lol

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Imagine repying “danke”, which is thanks in German

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        And why do people need to pander to you specifically? Cant people be themselves?

        Those are narcissistic traits.

        • Ramόn Sánchez @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Who said anything about me, specifically? Saying “no problem” makes you sound insincere or that the task the customer asked you to do, was literally no problem and that’s the only reason you complied. There are all kinds of ways people can interpret that, but only one way to interpret “you’re welcome”.

          I’m not going to say anything if you say that, but don’t act surprised when older people aren’t as forgiving.

          • xantoxis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            only one way to interpret “you’re welcome”

            This is just wrong. Tone matters just as much with “you’re welcome” as it does with “no problem”. Language is fluid like that, and it’s completely arbitrary to elevate one of these expressions over the other when both are in common usage.

            Also, you’re deliberately misrepresenting what “no problem” means, in regards to “that’s the only reason you complied”. Nobody says it that way, and I don’t believe that you think they do.

            • Ramόn Sánchez @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Using semantics to make your point, is lazy and misleading. Of course you could say “you’re welcome” in a tone that could be taken as rude, but that wasn’t the point. The point was showing the difference between the two phrases.

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            If someone says you’re welcome, you know they are a corporate drone and management wants them to say that to avoid certain people making a scene. Why’s it insincere to say no problem? In the same vein, they only said you’re welcome because they are complying too.

            There’s no issues with saying no problem unless you want there to be. Those are cool workplaces.

            • Ramόn Sánchez @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I just pointed out the problem. That phrase can interpreted many ways. We are also not talking about office buildings, we are specifically talking about the hospitality industry, where the language you use makes a significant impact on the customer’s experience.

          • scottywh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            The implication is that a problem was assumed until “no problem” was stated.

            “No problem” is absolutely low key rude.

      • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        “No problem” takes “You’re welcome” and implies that it was of no inconvenience to you either. But I understand that older generations find it important that service workers be most humbly at their service, and adhere to a strict social etiquette just short of “Yes, m’lord” and “Shall I suck upon your dick, sir?”

        “You’re welcome” is more appropriate in a professional setting, but if you’re getting your jimmies in a rustle over someone saying “No problem” to you instead, you’re a bit of an assfuck.

          • soupcat@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t think either phrase is impolite. Good manners are a made up thing. If someone said ‘thanks’ to me and I said ‘tiddle dee dee’ I’m not being rude, just a bit weird, nobody’s honour has been questioned, I haven’t said anything that could be taken as an offence.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you are a service worker at a restaurant, then that is literally your job, to serve.

          I love it when I order a sandwich at my local banh mi place near my office and you can see the cashier literally eye roll every customer that orders. They can’t even look you in the eye…

  • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m glad that the attitude that if you don’t speak “correctly,” then you are not worth engaging with is dying out.

    Well, on the grammar front, anyway.

    • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m glad the “not worth engaging with” attitude is dying out, but I do still think it’s important to push for people to communicate accurately and effectively, which includes understanding and following grammatical rules when needed.

      Language and vocabulary are essential to how we think and collectively problem-solve.

      • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yep, I get the “Language is constantly evolving” argument, but if I have to read your sentence three times just to parse it because you were too lazy to press a few keys, I’d consider that disrespectful to whomever is reading your comments

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The point of language is to communicate information.

        If the information was successfully relayed, the language exchange was successful.

        If the person knows you MEAN “hello, I would like two of these items here, thank you good sir. hands cash and cashier says thank you You’re welcome. Have a pleasant day, sir” when you SAY “Sup, two please. Thanks man. No problem have a good one.” then you have successfully languaged.

        So when my wife with a plethora of issues involving word recall says some insane thing because she can’t remember the right words, as long as I understand what she means, her language did it’s job.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think they are finding that they will be lonely if they want to continue to follow that path.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      It should of died out long ago and on the side of academic linguistics did, but on the internet sadly not so much

  • Ramόn Sánchez @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    Personally, I feel like they were just trying to get people to use proper English rather than slang.

    It’s not that they’re all dead and that’s why you don’t hear it anymore, it’s that things have gotten significantly worse for kids these days and getting them to speak proper English seems the least of their worries. Hahaha

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Language evolves and anyone who refuses to accept that is a philistine.

      If the person understands what you’ve said, congratulations you just succeeded in communication. Why does everything have to be “proper”? Who decided that? Oh yeah, the old philistines trying to quash “hey”.

      • Ramόn Sánchez @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why does everything have to be proper? So you don’t sound like a fifth grader while “communicating”.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Why does that matter? If I can communicate with my friends in half the time, it’s more time to do other stuff.

          Don’t be jealous, grab a book and get with the times. You could always join them, you can also keep your old lingo so you can communicate with other older people too. Young kids already flip between the lingos, why can’t you?

          • Ramόn Sánchez @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            11 months ago

            Why would I be jealous? Also, I don’t need to “grab a book and get with the times”, I’ll just stick to speaking English, LMFAO.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Which English…? You just used an acronym/phrase that’s not “proper” English……

              Also, is “proper” before Shakespeare? Invented lots of words, why are those acceptable, but not newer stuff?

              • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                11 months ago

                Honestly it seems like most people have assumed that the way things are now is how they’ll always be. I’m not sure why everyone seems to think this but I’ve noticed it everywhere with almost everyone.

                There’s this sense that everyone seems dug in and rooted and acting like their entire world isn’t subject to change on a whim.

                It’s really fuckin weird.

              • Ramόn Sánchez @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                11 months ago

                I used an acronym so I wouldn’t have to spell it all out. I wouldn’t say LMFAO in a verbal conversation. 🤦🏻‍♂️

                Honestly, I’m not like the boomers, I don’t really give a f**k what you sound like. If you want to sound like you have the education of a fifth grader, who am I to judge?

                The OP obviously has a chip on his/her shoulder over this, given the reasoning.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Right…. so it’s acceptable for you to do it? But not other people? Can a young kid not decide you’re not worth their time and communicate their own way…?

                  What is proper English? Where is the line? You just thought it was acceptable to use a modern acronym. It’s hypocritcal to claim you speak proper English, than end it with that.

                  You just sounded like a third grader yourself. I understood you fine, theres nothing wrong with that, if it makes things easier and smoother, all the better for people.

      • _number8_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        someone on reddit got pissed at me for not writing a ‘coherent’ comment, ie because i didn’t use enough capital letters. so anachronistic, don’t you know the style now old man?

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It does seem to come from narcissism. It’s a two way street, we need to know how to communicate old school and talk to our elders, but weren’t they also raised to look something up in a dictionary? They don’t want to learn, so no it’s on you to do it so you can talk to me.

          I’m 34 I’m gonna struggle with keeping up with my kids lingo haha.

    • inasaba@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      None of what we speak today is “proper English.” Languages are constantly evolving.

    • SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also, the kids they were telling off in the early nineties are pushing fifty now and won’t take any shit from an octogenarian.

  • kool_newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Was there really a cause behind that? I always thought it was people just being silly.

      • EnlightenMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is how I always perceived it. I can’t even imagine someone saying that with a straight face as a correcting rebuke.

        • Spendrill@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It does, and if there is a recorded version at that date you can bet it had been floating around for longer than that. Reason I said 50’s is because that was when my parent’s generation were in their young adulthood which if you think about it is where all these catchphrases really set up home in your brain. The other thing, now I think on it, is that it wasn’t said as a response to ‘Hey’ as a greeting it was always said to stop the somewhat Cockney way of indicating you hadn’t heard. What they wanted you to say was ‘Pardon?’ or even ‘I beg your pardon?’, they didn’t like ‘What?’ all that much and couldn’t abide ‘Eh?’ or ‘Ay?’ So it it was usually more of that same ‘Don’t talk to your elders like that’ bullshit that all the baby boomers rebelled against.

  • MJKee9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    In the nineties, i had an old guy respond “‘Hey’ is the first stage of horse shit.”. I still use it to this day.

    • KreekyBonez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      that’s so much better. I’m 100% incorporating that into my daily phrases

  • grandkaiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    My old man used to say (in a sing-song voice):

    Hay is for horses

    Sometimes cows

    Chickens would eat it

    But they don’t know how

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Not once did someone say that to me in a corrective or condescending way. It was always a playful joke.

    In elementary school we used to say “hay is for horses, and cows like you!”.

  • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I remember my mom getting uptight over the word “sucks”, as in “that sucks” or “it really sucked”. Literally everyone was saying it, there was no way I could help it lol

  • Cultural_Hope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    In 2005 ‘Hello there - General Kenobi!’ became the acceptable greeting amongst teenagers and old timers. Lets bring it back.